借鉴主体间性理论实现“思政”课优势转化

西方主体间性理论对我国高校思想政治教育理论课教学具有一定的借鉴作用,如何借鉴主体间性理论实现高校思想政治理论课由教材优势向教学优势转化,是当前我国高校思想政治教育教学的一个重要课题。坚持马克思主义基本理论的基础上借鉴西方主体间性理论,对实现思想政治课由教材优势向教学优势转化,提高思想政治理论课的教学实效具有极积意义。     

主体问性教育视角下的高校学生评教分析

学生评教是高等教育中一项饱受争议的制度。学界对学生评教制度有赞成和反对两派不同的观点,其争论的实质是教师和学生在教育过程中的主体性地位问题。主体间性教育思想超越了“教师主体”和“学生主体”的争论,将教学过程的本质聚焦在师生交往互动的关系上,为学生评教提供了新的理论基础。在此基础上,本文分析了我国高校现有的学生评教制度存在的不足之处,同时借鉴国外高校学生评教的做法,提出相应的改进建议。     

苏轼文艺美学的主体间性

苏轼文艺美学的主体间性虽不充分、不纯粹,还不是有意识地主动追求,但其对审美体验的重视,其在现实空间和审美空间之间自由转换的审美体验,以及打通多种艺术形式的外在限制进入自由超越的审美境界,确实将中华美学向前推了一小步。     

Negotiating multiple identities between school and the outside world: a critical discourse analysis

This article examines interview talk of three students in an Australian high school to show how they negotiate their young adult identities between school and the outside world. It draws on Bakhtin's concepts of dialogism and heteroglossia to argue that identities are linguistically and corporeally constituted. A critical discourse analysis of segments of transcribed interviews and student-related public documents finds a mismatch between a social justice curriculum at school and its transfer into students' accounts of outside school lived realities. The article concludes that a productive social justice pedagogy must use its key principles of (con)textual interrogation to engage students in reflexive practice about their positioning within and against discourses of social justice in their student and civic lives. An impending national curriculum must decide whether or not it negotiates the discursive divide any better.     

新时代劳动教育的家庭复归——基于苏霍姆林斯基教育思想的视角

家庭在"劳动教育整体"中的重要性得到普遍承认,但是在劳动教育实际进行过程中,家庭方面往往会陷入被遗忘而导致缺失的境地.苏霍姆林斯基是苏联时期著名的教育实践家和教育理论家,在其劳动教育思想中,有不少家庭成分包含其中.我们看待苏霍姆林斯基的教育思想,不能局限于学校和教师的视角,而应该拓宽可供使用的教育渠道,整合为大多数孩子...     

主体间性与教育交往

21世纪人类的交往实践格局 ,呼唤类主体的出现。类主体是 2 1世纪教育所要培养的目标。类主体不同于个人主体 ,个人主体的主体性表现为一种以占有为目的的单子式主体性 ,类主体表现为以存在为目的的主体间性。前者的产生诉诸于主—客二分模式 ,后者的产生诉诸于主—主交往模式。当今研究主体教育 ,必须明确培养学生的主体间性 ,同时用交往的精神审视和改造现代教育     

主体教育理论:从主体性到主体间性

近代的教育理论是在主体性框架中建构的,其历史的意义不容低估。但当代的发展使主体性教育理论陷入了困境,所以,当代的教育理论应当开始主体间性的拓展。主体间性为教育理论提供了新的哲学范式和方法论原则,从而在新的基础上还原了教育和教育研究的本真。     

The places of pedagogy: or,what we can do with culture through intersubjective experiences

Beginning by highlighting considerations of the intersections among social and ecological issues and the recent diversification of critical pedagogy, this paper suggests means by which approaches such as Gruenewald’s (2003 Gruenewald, D.A. 2003. The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4): 3–12. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]) “critical pedagogy of place” can be expanded to accommodate a broader range of possible places of pedagogy. The paper is centrally concerned with what happens when we consider socio‐ecological learning, not as occuring via cognitive critique or embodied place‐based experience, but rather as taking place in between the thought and the sensed via a range of intersubjective experiences. It suggests that these intersubjective locations that comprise the “where” of the learning of the student can be particular physical places, but can also be in and of experiences of friendship, art, literature, irony, cultural difference, community. By expanding our possible repertoire of “pedagogical arts,” or the range of intersubjective places and spaces of pedagogy engaged, we are able to conceptualise and practise education in ways that enable a deeper connection to place but also opportunities for other modes and outcomes of student learning. In particular, the paper outlines the possibilities for learning and cultural formation enabled by spaces of collective youth engagement.     

Pedagogical intersubjectivity,autism and education: can teachers teach so that autistic pupils learn?

Effective pedagogy and inclusive practice are located within the quality of learning relationships and the context-sensitive, moment-to-moment professional judgements made by teachers within learning interactions. In particular, good teachers are able to align themselves with pupils’ subject positions, though this experience of relatedness within learning interactions is a bodily one that is mundane and mostly overlooked. The aim of this article is to explore whether this account of learning, that crucially involves a shared way of being minded, is adequate to describe the learning of pupils on the autism spectrum. Problems with the idea of ‘pedagogical intersubjectivity’ in relation to autism are noted. Using personal accounts of learning interactions and recent micro-level research findings about the competences of autistic children in favourable interactional ecologies, it is argued however that experiences of relatedness in learning should be considered as important for autistic pupils too. It is concluded that a key aspect of good practice in relation to autism and education is that teachers are able to critically reflect on their bodily experiences of interaction with autistic pupils as a way of deepening their understanding and developing their professional practice.     

Tutors seen through the eyes of mentors assumptions for participation in third space in teacher education

The aim of this Norwegian study is to get a deeper understanding of the assumptions for building third spaces in teacher education. Learning in different contexts may open for development of new knowledge in the third space through intersubjectivity based on confidence, respectful disagreement and a common aim. This is the backdrop for the current study where a group of mentors with and without mentor education are interviewed focusing on tutors’ competences and responsibilities. Findings show that mentors have an unclear understanding of who the tutors are. Experiences from teaching are essential for mentors’ understanding of tutors as respectful collaborators. Educated mentors value theoretical knowledge and research higher than non-educated. The conclusion is that tutors and mentors should have knowledge about and respect for each-others’ competence and responsibilities and that mentor education is a promising assumption for building third spaces and developing a pedagogy for teacher education.