在线印象管理视角：创新动机与创新绩效研究

企业创新活动逐渐由封闭走向开放,互联网品牌创新社区成为企业创新的重要场所。本文基于社会心理学的视角,以在线印象管理为核心概念,对用户创新参与动机、印象构建行为及对创新绩效的影响进行了研究。实证发现：追求知识共创动机和追求网络社交动机的社区成员,采用获得性印象管理行为的可能性显著大于采用保护性印象管理行为;追求社群认同动机的社区成员,采用保护性印象管理行为的可能性显著大于采用获得性印象管理行为。品牌创新社区成员的社龄长短对采纳印象管理行为产生影响。获得性印象管理行为较保护性印象管理行为对品牌创新社区的创新绩效有更正面的影响。本研究拓展了品牌创新社区用户研究的理论视角,也为企业识别在线用户创新参与动机,从而制定合适的激励机制以提升创新绩效提供了建设性的启示。     

交流可见度视角下在线知识共享网络用户认知和情感研究

[目的/意义]探索不同交流可见度环境对在线知识共享网络用户认知和情感的影响,旨在推动知识共享和知识创新实践。[方法/过程]利用质性研究方法开展研究,先设计了访谈提纲,然后利用访谈法搜集数据,再利用主题分析法分析数据。[结果/结论]分析了匿名环境和实名环境对用户认知和情感的影响,识别了7个主题;分析了即时交流环境和非即时交流环境对用户认知和情感的影响,识别了5个主题;分析了一对一、多对多、大众传播、一对多交流可见度环境对用户认知和情感的影响,识别了7个主题;分析了知识搜寻行为可见/不可见的交流环境对用户认知和情感的影响,识别了4个主题。文章为在线知识共享网络用户研究提供了新视角。     

基于OBE理念的线上教学实践探索及后疫情时代思考——以“测控仪器设计”课程为例

为抗击新冠肺炎疫情,我国开启了"停课不停学"大规模线上教学实践。该文以"测控仪器设计"课程为例,积极开展了基于OBE理念的线上教学重构设计,从教学目标、教学内容、教学方法、质量监控、评价体系、持续改进等方面进行了实践探索。基于线上教学的实践探索和教学反思,提出了后疫情时代教师发展和教学改革的新思路。     

在线开放课程下混合式教学学习效果的研究--以“数据库基础”课程为例

本文以"数据库基础"课程为例,以学习者的学习过程和教学者的教学活动为研究对象,经过两个周期的在线开放课程建设后,根据教学数据进行统计分析,研究结果表明,采用在线开放课程进行混合式教学的学生成绩与没有参加过的学生成绩具有显著性差异。在线学习活动的完成率和正确率与学习者最后的考试成绩有较强的相关性。     

网上文献传递服务的定量分析与对策——以南昌大学为例

本文根据南昌大学图书馆2006-2007年网上文献传递数据,从文献传递申请量、申请文献类型、申请文献学科分布和申请文献语种4个方面进行统计分析。结果表明,我国图书馆文献申请量出现显著增长的势头;读者申请的文献类型以期刊论文所占比例最大,学位论文次之,会议论文位居第三;材料学院的文献申请数最多,其次是生命学院。最后,指出了网上文献传递中存在的4个问题,并针对性地提出了改进的建议和对策。     

‘You want us to teach outdoor education where?’ Reflections on teaching outdoor education online

This article reports on the experiences of two lecturers working at the University of Tasmania required to teach outdoor and sustainability education (O&SE) courses online. Using an (auto)ethonographic case-study approach, the lecturers were interviewed with a view to exploring their perceptions, challenges, ethical dilemmas, tensions, opportunities and experiences in this space. A number of themes emerged, including commitment to quality teaching and learning, the role of experience, and experiential learning, in the online space, the challenge of fostering a connection to place, difficulties faced when trying to develop a learning community, and the role of professional learning and support in terms of pedagogy and technology in the online space. These themes, and their implications for teaching and learning in higher education both generally, and specifically in O&SE, are discussed in light of what is a mounting body of literature exploring the move to online delivery in higher education.     

对于有效开展网上教学活动的思考——以“公共政策概论”课程为例

网上教学活动环节是电大教学中为学生开展远程辅导最为重要的一环,可目前总体来看,网上教学活动开展的效果并不理想。文章结合行政管理专业的公共政策概论课程的网上教学活动开展的实践,在分析教学过程和效果的基础上,探讨了有效开展网上教学活动的途径与方法。     

生态视角下网络教学资源的开发

面对网络教学资源相对陈旧、种类单调,资源的重复建设现象严重的情况,可以将网络教学资源、网络环境、开发人员、学习者作为一个生态系统,从生态学的视角出发,运用生态理论来研究网络教学资源建设过程中的问题,指导开发优质网络教学资源,创建远程学习的生态学习环境。     

If You Build It and They Still Don't Come: Effective versus Successful Alternative Teacher Preparation

The continuing shortage of special education teachers, combined with increased ideological critiques of teacher education programs, has spurred the growth of alternative models of teacher preparation. Only recently have professional standards for alternative models been proposed. This paper summarizes two years of a program based on professional standards. External influences, internal design, and implementation elements are presented. Results suggest that there is value in distinguishing between the effectiveness of alternative programs and their success.     

Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment

The need for supporting student writing has received much attention in writing research. One specific type of support is feedback—including peer feedback—on the writing process. Despite the wealth of literature on both feedback and academic writing, there is little empirical evidence on what type of feedback best promotes writing in online environments. This article reports on research that tries to determine what type of feedback best improves the quality of collaborative writing and what the effects of feedback are on student learning in an environment based on asynchronous written communication. The results reveal that concerning the type of feedback, epistemic feedback or epistemic and suggestive feedback best improve the quality of collaborative writing performance. The nature of the feedback-giver (whether teacher feedback or teacher and peer) makes a difference to the final text only when the feedback is epistemic, or epistemic and suggestive.