微文化背景下大学生思想政治教育研究

随着微文化的不断发展,全国各地大学生的沟通交流方式越来越趋向于网络流行化。就现实角度而言,微文化动摇了高校思想政治教育的权威性,对传统思政教育的模式以及内容皆产生了一定的冲击,增加了高校思政教育者的难度,弱化了学生对主流价值观的认同。文中首先就微文化进行简要概述,其次针对微文化背景下的大学生思政教育提出有效的策略。     

普通科技语篇中的人际意义

不同潜在的读者对科技英话语域特征造成的影响开始受到人们的重视。本文将主要通过作者在人称,语气和情态中作出的选择对普通科技语篇做一个粗略的分析,探索科技语篇中的人际意义。     

早期科技期刊与人才培养 ——以《数理杂志》为例

运用文献考证法,对我国高校最早创办的数理期刊——《数理杂志》的核心作者和内容进行分析.认为:早期的科技期刊以教师为指导、学生为编辑和作者的主体,其发表的内容更趋于传播和探讨,这对数理学科的早期人才储备和培养是有积极意义的.期刊的育人功能在《数理杂志》的办刊历史上得到了集中体现.     

科技期刊编辑新媒体出版能力的培育

分析我国科技期刊编辑现状和新时期编辑职业能力的新要求,通过对出版格局的统筹策划能力、专业领域的预研判断能力、新媒体技术的开发应用能力、出版大数据的挖掘分析能力、出版实践的组织协调能力、面向国际战略的综合拓展能力等6个方面的解析,提出了当今科技期刊编辑所应具备和培养的全媒体出版的适应能力.     

高校学报体制改革实践——以《北京航空航天大学学报》为例

《北京航空航天大学学报》于2013年8月进行体制改革,采取学术与出版分离的办刊模式.文章以此为例,阐述实施方案、实践过程中的困难、解决措施,以及改革后的效果和变化,为探索更加科学有效的科技期刊改革方案提供参考.     

提高国民生活质量和国家竞争力——韩国新世纪的人力资源开发战略简析

韩国政府为了实现在21世纪成为“世界超一流国家”的宏伟目标，在对现存教育与人力资源开发体制进行反省的基础上，决定把强化人力资源开发作为国家发展的核心战略。2001年12月制定出台了《人、知识、跨越：国家人力资源开发基本计划》，确立了“提高国民生活质量和国家竞争力”的人力资源开发目标和一系列政策保障措施。     

高校思想政治理论课教育教学的态势分析

现阶段高校思想政治理论课的教育教学既存在优势也存在劣势,既拥有机遇也蕴涵威胁,优势、劣势、机遇、威胁这四个方面存在内在的关联,构成四种不同的矩阵--组合方式.基于四种不同的矩阵--组合分析,新形势下的思想政治理论课教育教学的改革对策是:发挥优势、把握机遇、抑制劣势、战胜威胁.     

中国四省市与新加坡学生科学素养表现之比较——基于PISA2015数据的分析

PISA2015科学素养测试结果于2016年底正式公布后,受到社会各界的广泛关注。研究者从OECD在线公布的数据库中选取中国四省市与新加坡的有关数据,对两个经济体15岁在校生的科学素养表现进行比较分析,并通过多水平分析探讨影响学生科学素养的关键因素。结果发现:中国四省市学生在科学素养测试总量表及各分量表上的成绩均非常显著地低于新加坡学生,分差在32.82~43.29之间,效应量达到中等强度;中国四省市学生在工具性动机上得分非常显著地高于新加坡学生,但在科学乐趣与科学自我效能得分上非常显著地低于新加坡学生;在影响因素方面,家庭经济、社会和文化地位、科学乐趣、科学课纪律氛围、教师中科学教师的比例等因素对两个经济体的学生成绩具有显著正向预测效应,但考试焦虑、工具性动机、教师探究式教学等因素表现出显著的负向预测效应。中国四省市要有意识地借鉴新加坡教育经验,改革与完善科学教育,具体建议有:(1)进一步推动课程与教学改革,重视探究式教学与学生批判性思维的培养;(2)加强学校人力资源管理,提高教师专业水平;(3)关注学生非认知表现,激发学生科学学习的内部动机。     

师专生“两课”课程学习偏好问卷调查分析

本文通过对师专生"两课"学习偏好问卷调查结果的分析,认为在师专"两课"教学改革中需要注意以下问题:注重教学对象的实际与教学的切入点问题、注重"大课堂"与"小课堂"的结合问题、考试与考试方式的多样化问题。     

The potential role of citizen conservation in re-shaping approaches to murals in an urban context

Public visual spaces, populated by a blend of community murals, unauthorised street art, and historic painted mercantile signs, are often the mark of an urban environment that is both progressive and eclectic. Changes in the aesthetic and cultural value of these urban mural forms have led to an increase in the appreciation and, in some instances, promotion of their artistic merit and cultural significance as examples of public art. However, examining the significance of these works, with a view to implementing a conservation approach is problematic. This is due to a number of practical and theoretical considerations that are primarily a result of the ephemeral existence of urban murals outside conventional exhibition spaces, and issues associated with their often fragmented ownership and uncertain authorship. Consequently, larger thinking on the interpretation, conservation assessment, and advocacy for the conservation of urban murals are required. Key to defining and implementing such strategies is contextualising the public visual spaces that these murals occupy and, as part of this, the local and wider communities’ perception of these murals as culturally significant objects as well as fostering awareness and understanding of appropriate measures aimed at their conservation. This paper examines the role of citizen science, or crowd-sourcing, of local community members in establishing a conservation dialogue and generating conservation- relevant data on urban murals. It looks specifically at a project involving a collection of in situ historic painted mercantile signs — also known as ghost signs — in the City of Port Phillip, Melbourne, Australia. The project fostered the establishment of an informed and open dialogue between conservation specialists and participants from the local community on the significance of local ghost signs whilst transferring knowledge on conservation processes and assessment methods. Working directly with community members, a programme was designed in which conservation and community knowledge of these urban art forms, could be collected and exchanged across digital platforms. This enabled researchers to examine how citizen science can be utilised as a research tool as well as a means to advocate for the conservation of collections of urban murals. It created the opportunity to consider the role of non-specialists and shared authorities in the collection and collation of conservation- relevant data and how information generated from what we call citizen conservation projects, can inform the way in which conservators evaluate and prioritize the conservation of urban cultural heritage. The data gathered and interpreted proved to be the most effective means of ‘conserving’ these often ephemeral forms of cultural material.