近年来中国学校体育课程改革的理性思考

通过对我国近年来体育课程改革中若干问题的分析探讨,认为:在体育教学本质功能、目标定位、教学评价、课程资源开发等认识方面存在误区。主要表现在:教育理念被曲解,教学目标被扩大,教学的核心教材被忽视,教学评价失真等。建议:树立体育课程教学目标主次观,增强体质是首要目标,健康是最高目标,教学评价应重视生理效应,体育与健康分别开课等改革主张。     

近五年高校健美操教学科研现状分析与研究

运用文献资料、数理统计和逻辑分析相结合的研究方法,对2000~2004年国内公开发表的291篇我国高校健美操教学科研论文的数量、内容、方法,作者职称及学历结构进行分析,结果表明科研论文数量较多,呈平稳上升趋势;内容主要集中在教学方法、教学改革与素质教育方面,心理、音乐、表现力、多媒体、竞赛方面论文较少;研究方法以文献资料法为主;健美操理论研究相对薄弱。     

运用举重指数对我国男子举重现状的评价

举重指数是由举重成绩和运动员的体重2项指标进行计算而得,是一个较为通用的举重力量评价指标。通过对2 0 0 4年全国举重锦标赛上8个级别的前8名运动员的举重指数分析表明,目前我国运动员的平均抓举、挺举、总成绩指数分别为8.2 0、9.97及18.0 7,与世界纪录相比,我国抓举指数要差13.4 % ,挺举差12 .6 % ,总成绩差13.5 % ;举重指数在中、小级别上变化较为平稳,而在94kg级以上的大级别中,指数有一个明显的下降趋势;8个级别中,我国 10 5kg级发展水平最底,而6 9kg及6 2kg级的发展水平最高,竞争最强。     

我国体育科技发展问题研究综述

通过文献分析,总结体育科技体制改革、体育科技成果贡献、体育科技服务、体育科技资源及创新激励等方面的研究成果,提出需进一步研究的问题1)体育科技服务要围绕奥运争光计划和全民健身计划的需要进行创新;2)体育科技创新激励如何解决个人创造与组织创造的机制冲突;3)如何构建体育科技创新资源整合体系;4)解决体育科技成果转化中各创新要素缺乏“联动”的瓶颈突破口在于如何重新构架体育科技体制和调整制度安排。     

我国大型体育场(馆)运营过程中的风险管理研究

对曾经成功举办过奥运会的国家和国外一些著名的大型体育场(馆)风险管理的先进模式与实践经验进行比较分析,探讨我国大型体育场(馆)在运营中应关注的各种风险管理问题。结果表明:我国应从自然风险、管理风险、人因风险、设备风险和技术风险等几个方面对场(馆)进行风险管理;个人意外伤害保险、公共责任保险、意外事故保险与财产保险等风险转移和市场化是处理风险的主要策略。揭示了当前我国体育场(馆)风险管理面临缺乏对风险管理的高度重视,缺乏适合我国国情与国际惯例的运营机制和立法保障,缺乏专门风险管理人才和相关风险评估机构,缺乏满足我国市场需求的各种相关体育保险产品等几大问题。     

普通高校体育教学内容"主体项目"心理评价指标体系构建

在“以人为本,健康第一”的指导思想下,以活动理论观为逻辑起点,运用文献资料调研、逻辑推理等方法,构建普通高校体育教学内容的“主体项目”心理评价指标体系,即尽情发挥的心理体验和尽情享受的心理体验两个层次12项子指标,从快乐心理体验角度优化和评估项目群体。     

我国优秀男子100m跑运动员体能水平的评价与诊断

采用文献资料调研、问卷调查、专家访谈、测试与数理统计等研究方法,经过分层逐步回归分析,筛选出了有效反映我国男子100m跑健将级运动员体能水平的10项指标。对100m跑运动员体能各指标与100m跑成绩间的关系进行了灰色关联分析,并对运动员的体能水平进行了评价与诊断。     

Analyzing the Contemporary Czech Literary Web

ABSTRACT

It has become difficult to evaluate and gauge the extent of the ever-expanding Czech literary web. This article focuses on analyzing the current status of the Czech literary web and associated online repositories. For purposes of this article, the author examined twenty open access Czech sites whose subject matter is Czech literature. Out of these twenty websites, the author analyzed five sites in great detail. The data for the analysis was extracted initially in December of 2014.     

CONTENTdm Digital Collection Management Software and End-User Efficacy

ABSTRACT

Digital libraries and collections are a growing facet of today's traditional library. Digital library technologies have become increasingly more sophisticated in the effort to provide more and better access to the collections they contain. The evaluation of the usability of these technologies has not kept pace with technological developments, however, and the end-user has in some cases been left behind. This research study evaluates the usability of digital collections created using the CONTENTdm Digital Collection Management System, a software system used by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Specifically, this study addresses the following questions: Does CONTENTdm meet users' needs? Is the interface sufficiently intuitive for them to use it? Is the experience of exploring digital collections using CONTENTdm satisfying to users? Employing usability testing techniques with actual-end users, this study attempts to assess the efficacy of the CONTENTdm public interface as well as user attitudes toward it. Ten participants from three user groups—faculty, library science graduate students, and the general public—performed eleven tasks designed to test the key functions of CONTENTdm-created collections and then answered a series of questions about their experiences. Key findings from this study indicate that while the included digital collections are useful and desirable to end-users, the interface generated by CONTENTdm can be confusing even for those who have considerable experience using the Internet. Results from this study may be used to improve this software system and add to the literature surrounding the usability of digital libraries in general.     

Evaluating Electronic Reference Services

Summary

As electronic reference services become routine in many libraries, it is time to systematically examine how they are being implemented and used. Unfortunately, few libraries have rigorously examined their electronic reference services. We still know very little about who uses electronic reference services or why. We also do not know how satisfied our users are with the new services we are providing. This article provides an overview of the chief methodologies available for conducting assessments of electronic services (e.g., surveys, usability studies, observation, etc.). Existing criteria for evaluating reference services are discussed with suggestions for how they can be applied or adapted to the online service environment.