谈谈多卷书的著录问题

<正> 新近翻译出版的《专著出版物国际标准节目著录(第二版)》(ISBD(M).2nd ed.1988)对多卷书下了一个简洁而严密的定义,多卷书即“在物质形态上分为有限的若干部分,意在作为(或已作为)一个整体出版的专著出版物(不包括因出版或印刷需要而暂时分为若干分册的出版物),各部分可以有各自的题名与责任说明。”多卷书的著录是编目工作中经常遇到的问题,然而现行使用的著录标准或条例,如《英美编目条例(第二版)》(AACR2),《西文文献著录条例》(下称《西文条例》),《专著出版物国际标准书目著录(第二版)》(ISBD(M)2)都未对多卷书的著录方法作集中论述,这是因为,按西文编目的观点,多卷书被视为一部出版物,而不被认为是一种出版物类型,有关多卷书的著录规定都可在相关著录事项下面查到,其次,多卷书的著录基本上是一种具体的编目方法,受到所编文献本身、     

Modeling Epistemic and Ontological Cognition: Philosophical Perspectives and Methodological Directions

We propose an integration of aspects of several developmental and systems of beliefs models of personal epistemology. Qualitatively different positions, including realism, dogmatism, skepticism, and rationalism, are characterized according to individuals' beliefs across three dimensions in a model of epistemic and ontological cognition. This model incorporates ideas from philosophical epistemology, including a focus on students' multiple means of justification. Concerns regarding the psychometric qualities of quantitative measures of personal epistemology inform this model and its proposed operationalization. We suggest a means of statistical analysis that can be used to assess the construct and predictive validity of this conceptual model by testing the relations among positions, dimensions, and covariates of interest. Future research directions include investigating how individuals choose among various forms of justification.