排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
This paper reports two interrelated, exploratory training studies to promote word knowledge and textual comprehension through
elaboration in poor readers compared with their controls. The results suggest that systematic, sustained in situ training
helped these poor readers, although both the training approaches and stimulus materials would need refinement.
The study was assisted in part by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada with SSHRCC research grants
Nos. 410-87-0058 and 410-89-0128 awarded to Che Kan Leong. 相似文献
2.
Cheryl L. Blalock Michael J. Lichtenstein Steven Owen Linda Pruski Carolyn Marshall MaryAnne Toepperwein 《International Journal of Science Education》2013,35(7):961-977
The purpose of this review is to present a comprehensive evaluation of science attitude instruments based on published psychometric evidence. A multitude of instruments have been used through the years and some have been linked to career choice and school performance. Substantiating such associations is of paramount importance if researchers wish to influence educational policy. However, associations are reduced, or hard to discover, if instruments have weak psychometric properties. Several databases were searched for peer‐reviewed articles that discussed the development and use of science attitude instruments. Instruments were grouped into the following categories: attitudes toward science, scientific attitudes, nature of science, scientific career interests, and other. A data abstraction and scoring rubric was used to summarize and evaluate 150 published articles that spanned 66 instruments. Most instruments had single study usage and showed an absence of psychometric evidence. This review demonstrated that there are few instruments available with the necessary psychometric data to merit recommendation. The review quantifies the current state of the research regarding the measurement of science attitude in students; the results should elicit further discussion and encourage more rigorous analyses of instruments. The findings may assist other researchers to select an instrument and alert them to its strengths and weaknesses. This review points the way forward for research in this field. Instruments already in existence should be used in repeat studies, and reliability and validity evidence should be collected and shared. 相似文献
1