排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
The `co-productions' of science and society have undergone dramatic changes in recent decades. However, contrasts between `Mode 1' and `Mode 2' are not compelling inhistorical terms. This essay will argue that, in fact, they offer too naturalistic and a-political a picture. 相似文献
2.
Dominique Pestre 《Minerva》2009,47(3):243-260
What I consider in this paper are various forms of government, various technologies and discursive regimes of government that
are in common use today. What interests me are the categories and tools, practical dispositifs and languages that developed over the last decades ‘to constitute, define, organize, and instrumentalize the strategies that
individuals, acting freely, may use to deal with one another’ (Foucault). The paper considers first the neo-liberal wish to
reassert the individual as alone in responsibility for his/her own life after the unfortunate digression into Welfare Statism and Keynesian economics,
source of all ills. It then focuses on some material and social technologies that encourage people to accept full and complete
‘self-sovereignty’. This section leads to a discussion on the new demands (and resistance) society imposed on this liberal
normative ideal. It notably considers the growing demands to ‘participate’ in decision processes and to be environmentally
friendly. In section “Les Mots et Les Choses: A New Discursive Regime”, it considers the discursive regime that progressively
took shape and which currently permeates international governance bodies of all stripes—from the World Bank to the Conference
of Parties for Climate Change. In the final section, it comes back to the initial question and considers what these changes
actually mean for the democratic order as constituted over the past 250 years. 相似文献
3.
1