Academic self-efficacy,sense of coherence,hope and tiredness among college students with learning disabilities

Abstract

Some resilient students with LD succeed ‘against the odds’ and reach college. The goals of the study are to explore their resources and barriers during their studies. The relationships between academic self-efficacy (ASE) and personal resources (sense of coherence (SOC) and hope) among college students with learning disabilities (LD) will be examined. The sample consisted of 438 college students divided into two subgroups: 149 students with LD and 289 Non-LD students. Results indicated that college students with LD reported lower levels of ASE, as well as lower levels of hope subscales and SOC. Persistent challenges of early learning distress experienced by those students during school periods continue to be prevalent during their college years. The ASE was predicted by the personal resources, and the risk factor (tiredness lost its significance). The importance of personal resources (SOC and hope subscales) was further emphasised by the mediation model (PROCESS). They mediated the relationships between LD and ASE. These outcomes call for empowering interventional programmes in order to promote hopeful thinking and personal coherence.     

Pedagogy in practice: the pedagogy of a learning setting as students experience it

This paper opens a theoretical discussion regarding the pedagogy of a learning setting as students experience it. Students’ experience of learning deserves particular attention because it may differ from the pedagogy that is designed and campaigned for by the school, or even from the one that is ‘experienced’ by the teacher in the same situation. In order to open up such a discussion, we introduce the term ‘pedagogy in practice’ (PiP). This new term describes the pedagogy that actually acts on students’ thought and affects; it relates to the interaction between the school’s pedagogy and students’ experience of it. In this paper, we define the concept of PiP and examine its implications and differentiation from related pedagogic concepts. By doing so, we question educators’ and policy makers’ ability to understand, evaluate, make sense of, and eventually improve pedagogies or curricula in general without looking at PiP in particular.     

Teachers’ agency: Do their values make a difference?

This research explored antecedents and outcomes of teachers’ agency. Study 1 (n = 767) tested whether teachers’ values relate to an agentic capacity. Study 2 (n = 430) tested the relations between teachers’ values, their agentic capacity and their agentic behaviours. The findings show that attributing importance to promoting the self and being open to new experiences, whilst maintaining self-independence, is positively related to agentic capacity. Further, agentic capacity mediates the relations between values and agentic behaviour. These findings start to explain the broad motivations for teachers’ agency and its translation into behaviour.     

The response of clinical practice curriculum in teacher education to the Covid-19 breakout: A case study from Israel

PROSPECTS - This case study explores how teacher education curriculum in a college in Israel responded to the Covid-19 outbreak. The article focuses on the clinical component of the preservice...     

The road to solving a combinatorial problem is strewn with pitfalls

In this paper we examine typical difficulties involved in solving a combinatorial problem, and demonstrate them throughout the solution of the Problem of the misaddressed letters. We focus on difficulties of two sorts: Those which stem from the fact that a combinatorial problem is usually an infinite set of problems, and others which are involved in finding a systematic approach to their solution.     

Children's conditional reasoning

This study stemmed from a desire to redress the distorted view of mathematics in the elementary curriculum, created by the current imbalanced emphasis on computational rules and some applications, but very little logical analysis. The study is intended to show that fifth-grade students can significantly improve their use of logical analysis through a suitable instructional unit taught under ordinary classroom conditions.Concrete teaching materials were developed, through several trials and revisions, to familiarize students with the distinction between the valid inference patterns — Modus Ponendo Ponens and Modus Tollendo Tollens (AA, DC), and the fallacious ones — Affirming the Consequent and Denying the Antecedent (AC, DA). No formal rules were taught.The experimental unit was implemented four to five times a week for 23–25 sessions, by 4 fifth-grade teachers in their ordinary classes. The teachers participated in a twelvehour pretraining workshop.A pretest/posttest treatment/no-treatment design was applied to assess resulting improvement in students' conditional reasoning ability. The sample consisted of 210 fifth graders in a suburban area, 104 in 4 experimental classes and 106 in 4 control classes.A written group test was developed, through trials and revisions. Test items are formulated with a reasonable hypothetical content. Each item includes two premises: the first a conditional sentence, and the second either its antecedent, its consequent, or the negation of one of these, thus determining the logical form: AA, DC, AC, or DA. The question following the premises is stated positively. AA and DC are answered correctly by yes or no: AC and DA by not enough clues (NEC).The test contains 32 randomly-ordered three-choice items, eight in each logical form (two of the eight in each of the four possible modes in which negation may or may not occur in the antecedent or consequent). No sentential connective other than negation and conditional appears in the premises. Test/retest reliability was 0.79.Experimental and control group pretest performance levels did not differ (=0.05). More than 78% of the answers on AA and DC, and fewer than 33.1% on AC and DA, were correct. Overall pretest mean scores were 54.3% and 53.8% for the experimental and control groups respectively.There was a significant difference (=0.01) between the experimental and control groups' posttest overall performance—74.7% and 55.4%, respectively.There was no significant change in the control group's pretest and posttest performance levels on any logical form, or for the experimental group's on AA and DC. However, on AC and DA the two groups' gain scores were found significantly different.Negation mode, unlike logical form, was not found to be independently influential in analyzing test scores, but interacted with logical form.There was a pretest/posttest increase of 3.5 in experimental group frequency (percentaged) of incorrect NEC answers (AA and DC). As NEC appeared infrequently on the pretest, this increase was interpreted as learning that NEC is an acceptable answer. Separating out this effect from the percentaged frequency of correct NEC answers (AC and DA) left a pretest/posttest average increase of 37.8. This increase was attributed to learning when NEC is correct.Teachers were excited at the beginning, frustrated in the middle, and felt competent and involved in the project at the end. They felt the teaching should be less condensed. The majority of the students reacted positively to most parts of the experimental unit. However, some thought the unit as a whole was too repetitive and boring.No correlation was found between learning logic through the experimental unit and standard school achievement as measured by the Stanford Achievement Test (SAT). High, average, and low SAT achievers of the experimental group did not differ significantly in their pretest and posttest gain scores.Results of the study call for further investigation of the value and usefulness of teaching various parts of logic as an ordinary part of the elementary mathematics curriculum.This study was supported by NSF grants Nos. GW 7659 and PES 74-018450 and by an AAUW International Fellowship. It was carried out at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1974/75 under supervision of Professor Leon Henkin.     

Uncovering students’ thinking about thinking using concept maps

A method for uncovering students’ thinking about thinking, specifically their meta-strategic knowledge, is explored within the context of an ongoing, multi-year intervention designed to promote the development of students’ thinking dispositions. The development of a concept-map instrument that classroom teachers can use and an analytic framework for interpreting students’ responses is presented. In a preliminary study, the concept map instrument is piloted to evaluate changes in students’ conceptions of thinking after a year’s participation in classrooms where their teachers actively sought to make thinking more visible by noticing and naming the thinking observed as well as introducing and using thinking routines (Ritchhart and Perkins. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 57–61 2008). Concept maps from 239 students from grades 3 through 11 were analyzed. Results suggest that students’ conceptions of thinking do improve with age but also can be substantially developed through a classroom culture where thinking is modeled and rich opportunities for thinking are present. The concept map instrument itself proved to be a robust instrument for uncovering students’ thinking about thinking.     

From isolation to symphonic harmony: Building a professional development community among teacher educators

Professional development among teacher educators requires a framework in which collaborative learning can support growth and change. This study describes a professional development project modeled on a professional development community focused on thinking education in a teachers college. Qualitative measures revealed a multilayered process consisting of breaking personal and professional isolation through interdisciplinary collaboration, talk about student learning, improvement of teaching through skill acquisition, and professional development with the adaptation of new teaching dispositions and a sense of efficacy. The community was characterized by a safe environment which encouraged risk taking and mutual support, enabling significant change in college courses.     

Masculine Female Adolescents at School

The current literatures on girls, queer youth, and multicultural education have ignored a significant group of young people and their experiences in school. This research is a retrospective exploratory study of masculine female adolescent schooling experiences, focusing on the school experiences of adults aged 18-54 who were socially defined as "girls" but who presented a masculine gender expression. This group of people, who may call themselves "tomboys," "butches," or "transgendered" are so underrepresented in the dominant discourses that there is no common language by which to categorize them. In interviews conducted over the past year, these participants revealed the transphobia, homophobia, and misogyny, as well as the support and freedoms they experienced within educational systems. This study reveals the need for critical examination of school policies and their impact on transgender youth. Further development of anti-oppressive curricula which address gender expression as a form of diversity is needed, as well as a better understanding by teachers of the complexity and multiplicity of gender expression.