诉讼欺诈侵财行为定性研究

诉讼欺诈行为具有严重的社会危害性,但由于行为本身带有的复杂性和性质的特殊性,加之我国现行刑法对其也无明文规定,导致司法实践中对此类行为的定性和处罚结果差异甚大,刑法理论界也存在颇多争议。对于诉讼欺诈行为,在目前刑法尚未作出专门评价的情形下,宜按诈骗罪定罪处罚。又因诉讼欺诈行为的社会危害性具有独特性,以诈骗罪论处不足以全面和准确评价之,我国刑法应单独设立“诉讼欺诈罪”。     

应加强刑法数学研究——从信用卡诈骗罪拟制款缺陷透视

我国刑法学界对刑法数学的研究与立法、司法相脱节。造成执法难和难执法同时,常会出现以罪刑法定的名义违反罪责刑相适应的原则,使刑法两大铁则不能兼备。信用卡诈骗罪立法上的缺陷,也证明了这一点,在修订后的信用卡诈骗罪中,拟制款的规定未考虑当犯罪数额达到信用卡诈骗罪的“数额较大”而未达到盗窃罪的“数额巨大”的标准时的情况,若一概以盗窃罪定罪处罚,则重罪轻判,放纵了这一数额段的犯罪,这与此行为入罪时的标准相悖反。因此深入开展刑法数学研究为我国刑法学界理论研究不可或缺的内容。     

信用证欺诈例外原则探析

信用证欺诈例外原则是为了防范信用证欺诈而创设的,它是在肯定信用证抽象独立原则的基础上形成的,信用证欺诈例外原则的形成和发展标志着信用证制度的不断完善和进步。文章对信用证欺诈例外原则的产生及理论基础、信用证欺诈例外原则的适用条件、信用证欺诈的救济途径、信用证欺诈例外的豁免等问题进行了初步探析,以期对防范信用证欺诈问题有所裨益。     

驰名商标司法认定虚假诉讼的法律规制

我国驰名商标认定制度的异化以驰名商标司法认定虚假诉讼为最严重的表现形式,迫切需要设计出一套具体的防范及规制措施。要有效地对虚假诉讼行为进行规制,需要充分运用立法和行政综合治理手段,完善驰名商标的认定和监管制度,建立虚假诉讼案件的预防和识破机制,健全和创设程序法上的规制措施,建立实体法上的侵权损害赔偿机制。     

信用证诈骗罪的构成要件和刑罚适用探析

信用证诈骗罪主观上应当具有“非法占有目的”,侵犯的客体应当是信用证管理制度。信用证诈骗罪的客观表现形式多种多样,但对骗取信用证进行非法融资行为是否构成信用证诈骗罪,应取决于主观上是否具有“非法占有目的”。本罪在法定刑设置上还存在许多不合理之处,建议取消死刑,完善罚金刑、财产刑和资格刑,并严密对犯罪单位的处罚。     

金融诈骗罪的成因与治理对策

<刑法>分则第三章第五节规定了金融诈骗罪,该种犯罪的形成原因复杂.社会监控弱化、国民心态失衡是社会层面的原因,金融管理混乱、从业人员素质差是管理层面的原因,法律规定存有诸多缺陷且打击不力是法律层面的原因.此外,被害人本身也是一个重要因素.为了防治金融诈骗罪,有必要完善我国的刑事立法规定,改进立法模式、加大罚金刑的适用力度、增设剥夺参与金融业务的资格刑.同时,通过对执法者执法的约束和监督来提高执法者自身素质、建立并完善金融信用体系及金融机构认证体系也是重要的举措.     

Implications of Prelecture Material on Cognitive Load and Instructional Effectiveness in Cross‐Disciplinary IS Education: The Nexus of Benford's Law and SQL

For some time, there has been a call for cross‐disciplinary teaching within the business disciplines. With the rise of data and analytics, there is an opportunity for cross‐disciplinary teaching by integrating technology throughout the business curriculum. However, many business professors have little experience in cross‐disciplinary teaching. We hope to rectify this by introducing an approach that uses prelecture material to prepare students for learning concepts and terms that are not core to the focal class. In a study that combines Structured Query Language (SQL) coding with an audit principle called Benford's Law, we analyze the impact of adding prelecture material about Benford's Law on student's cognitive load, knowledge gained, and instructional efficiency. Results indicate that students who received a prelecture on Benford's Law outperformed the control group in performance measures related to Benford's Law, and that the instructional efficiency on Benford's Law was also higher for the treatment group. We did not find any significant differences in cognitive load between the two groups, nor did the treatment group perform significantly better when tested on the SQL concepts. We conclude that cross‐discipline teaching is a fine balance between each discipline and communicating to students the importance of both disciplines is key.     

Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics

We draw on rational crime theory to help analyse 55 articles that have been retracted from 734 peer-reviewed journals in the field of economics. We highlight and discuss what these findings indicate regarding the nature and pattern of research malpractice in that discipline. Particular attention is given to exploring “no reason” retractions and the policy guidelines of publishers regarding retracted papers. We conclude that the frequent vagueness of retraction statements, and a reluctance to signal research malpractice, generally results in little damage to the reputation of caught, and known, offenders. Thus, a key deterrent to engaging in research malpractice is lacking. To reduce the incidence of research malpractice, we offer several recommendations for publishers and journal editors.     

再论盗窃罪、敲诈勒索罪与诈骗罪的区别

盗窃、敲诈勒索与诈骗罪在学理上的区分是比较清楚的,没有什么大的分歧和争论,但是现实生活中的案例是形形色色的,单纯的学理区分有时候在司法实践中是比较难把握的,尤其是一个案件中涉及不同的行为时,我们如何认定行为人所犯何罪就很关键,因为这关系到被害人的利益能否得到很好的保护问题,同时还涉及到行为人的定罪量刑。     

论单位实施贷款诈骗行为的刑法规制——兼谈刑法第30条立法解释的正当性

《刑法》第30条的立法解释颁布之后,围绕该立法解释是否具有正当性以及该立法解释对单位实施贷款诈骗行为定罪量刑的影响展开了激烈的讨论。通过对该立法解释的正当性进行研究、对该立法解释的再解释,得出了结论:该立法解释具有正当性,并没有违反罪刑法定原则和罪责自负原则。单位贷款诈骗行为在实践中的规制与该立法解释并行不悖。单位与自然人共同犯罪的,采用"行为共同说"更加妥当。