体育文化基本概念辨析

本文在转述对体育文化概念的多派理解后，提出应该依据文化理论的基本原理，对体育进行文化学的分析。文章对“体育文化”以及与体育文化相关的“体育文化模式”、“体育文化冲突”、“体育文化交流”和“体育文化丛”几个概念给出具体分析。     

跨国企业集团面临的汇率风险及其规避

入世后，我国的市场适步向国际开放，我国企业也在不断走向国际市场。国际交易的频繁发生，不可避免地会对跨国企业集团产生一些影响。其中，汇率风险对任何跨国企业来说，都是一个不可避免的问题。那么，就目前而言，跨国企业面临的风险有哪些，如何去规避或降低这些风险，笔者就此作一些简单的分析，供大家参考。     

论纸型载体角色与地位的调整

在网络载体不断发展的背景下 ,纸型载体在科学信息交流中的作用和地位将下降 ,成为科学信息交流的辅助载体 ,主要承担科学信息的“阅读”功能和科研成果的社会认同功能。参考文献 14。     

基于Web服务器的XML数据库技术

目前,一个W eb服务器能够容纳大量的各种各样的内容,使得数据量出现了指数级的增长,这相应地也要求要有更有效的数据管理能力和更快、更精确的查询.而基于W eb服务器的XML数据库技术使W eb服务器中的数据处理更加简单化和动态化,在目前具有广阔的应用前景.     

海峡两岸体育交流合作的现状分析与对策研究

运用文献资料研究、情报搜集、问卷调查和专家访谈等方法,对海峡两岸体育交流的现状、特点,以及存在的问题进行了分析研究,对两岸关系及体育交流前景进行了展望,并提出未来体育交流的发展对策与措施.     

上海图书馆国际文献交换发展的SWOT分析

应用SWOT分析方法对上海图书馆国际文献交换的优势、劣势、机遇、威胁进行分析,并基于SWOT分析方法提出了四种战略,即SO战略、WO战略、ST战略和WT战略.在国际交换过程中,上海图书馆交换工作必须扬长避短,在提高文献质量的基础上,建设自己的特色,提高自己的竞争实力,在此基础上,结合文献交换市场的相关特征,笔者对上海图书馆国际文献交换今后如何发展提出了一些对策和建议.     

基于社会交换理论的情报学学科互动机制研究

从社会交换理论的视角来考察情报学的学科互动机制，从学科互动中的受馈和回馈两个方面讨论情报学与相关学科的互动，井对互动过程中的动力、存续条件、环境因素等作了进一步的探讨。     

Chinese Studies Librarianship in North America

Although American libraries had begun collecting Chinese language materials in the 19th century, notably the United States Library of Congress in 1869, Yale in 1878, Harvard in 1879, and Berkeley in 1896, East Asian studies librarianship in North America, including China studies librarianship, was not fully developed until the 1960s. There was no formal organization that represented the interest of Chinese studies librarians because there were few of them and most of them were China scholars rather than trained librarians. More than 100 years later, the number of Chinese studies librarians in North America has increased considerably, primarily in response to the demand in the field of China studies and more recently to the needs of immigrant population and the general public who has an interest in China.This paper traces the history and growth of Chinese studies librarianship in North America, documents the development of the professional organization that represents Chinese studies librarians, and exami.     

加强期刊间的学习与交流

期刊是作者与编辑智慧的结晶,每种期刊都有值得他人学习、借鉴之处.加强期刊间的相互学习与交流,有助于及时掌握科技动态和作者信息,提高编辑素质,吸取他人之长补自己之短.     

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.