Electronic Records Research Issues

This paper is an overview of the issues and concerns in the last decade of electronic records research. It highlights some achievement and identifies areas in which there remains a need for work, but mostly it examines the changing perception of what constituted the important questions in a field which was evolving quickly.     

Program Evaluation and Archives: An Essay on a Research Agenda

The author begins with comments on the importance and position of program evaluation (PE), mostly in the context of European archives. These observations, based on personal experience and on a preliminary literature review, show a definitive need for PE, despite its weak position in the managerial activities of archives. Next, the author highlights some special aspects of the evaluation of archival programs. Finally, the author draws conclusions from his general remarks and from his reading of the articles included in this thematic issue ofArchival Science. He outlines some tendencies and shifts in the definition and purposes of evaluation and a short research agenda, containing the most important issues for further development of PE in archives.     

美国教师教育的解制与专业化之争

在美国教师教育领域,解制和专业化是两大论争阵营。解制取向否定教师教育的必要性,批评教师教育在学科知识方面低标准和在教育类课程方面"高栅栏",倡导用替代性途径绕过正规教师教育,期望以较高效率达到提高学生成绩的目的;专业化取向把"解制"的观点看作是"外行"的,批驳其简单化理解,同时又将其看作挑战,主张认识教师教育的复杂性和不可替代性,通过高投入达到真正的高标准,让教师教育真正成为受人尊敬的专业。     

Inside out and outside in: How the COVID-19 pandemic affects self-disclosure on social media

As social distancing and lockdown orders grew more pervasive, individuals increasingly turned to social media for support, entertainment, and connection to others. We posit that global health emergencies - specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic - change how and what individuals self-disclose on social media. We argue that IS research needs to consider how privacy (self-focused) and social (other-focused) calculus have moved some issues outside in (caused by a shift in what is considered socially appropriate) and others inside out (caused by a shift in what information should be shared for the public good). We identify a series of directions for future research that hold potential for furthering our understanding of online self-disclosure and its factors during health emergencies.     

《奥林匹克2020议程:奥运会新规范》改革关键点及北京冬奥会的践行策略研究

《奥林匹克 2020议程：奥运会新规范》(下文简称《新规范》)是当前国际奥委会系列改革的前沿指导文件,对 2022年北京冬奥会具有重要的指导价值。文章对《新规范》进行了文本解析,归纳了《新规范》的 5个改革关键点：降低办奥成本、优化遗产举措、促进组织善治、提升品牌影响、改善服务水平。 鉴于当前北京冬奥会的筹办进展与现实需求,探讨北京冬奥会后续系列工作对改革关键点的践行策略： 规划场馆后续运营、能源消耗与资金利用的行动方案;不断完善遗产发展方案,确保遗产与城市协调发展;促进利益相关者的协同参与,提升赛事治理能力;借鉴国内外优秀经验,制定本土文化教育战略;围绕服务体系的核心领域,不断提升赛事水准。     

东京奥运会延期举办背景下东道主形象修复策略研究

新冠疫情对东京奥运会各项筹办工作和东道主形象产生了负面的影响,日本方面因时而变、因势利导,积极引导国际舆论走向,维护奥运会东道主的良好形象。东京奥运会延期举办事件的决策过程经历了4个发展阶段,对东京奥运会延期举办背景下各方定义的新闻议程进行了分析,结合新闻议程内容对奥运会东道主形象修复策略展开了研究。日本方面根据全球疫情变化、本国疫情防控形势和国际舆论走向,针对不同的发展阶段,采取了建立信心、推卸责任、拖延、诚意等形象修复策略,试图强化人们对于东京奥运会东道主安全条件的形象认知,致力于维护日本"安全之手"的国际形象,增强世界各国对于东京奥运会顺利举办的信心,在危机应对中实现国家利益最大化,其中不乏成功经验值得借鉴参考。     

中国传统体育文化的电视传播

采用文献资料法、抽样调查法,对中国传统体育文化的电视传播现状及问题进行分析,发现在西方体育文化全球化浪潮中,中国传统体育文化整体发展和传承面临危机。中国传统体育文化的退缩闭守,与其传播中的电视缺位不无关系。对中国传统体育文化与电视相合的特性进行梳理,提出应加强中国传统体育文化传播的电视营销,中国电视体育传媒界应对中国传统体育文化进行"议程设置",建立公共体育栏目、频道等对策。     

议程设置理论与后大众媒体时代的民意研究

关于媒体与民意的理论大部分提出于 1 93 0到 1 980年之间 ,这是一个仅仅拥有传统信息选择方式的时代。麦库姆斯和肖 (1 972 )最初提出议程设置理论时 ,用北卡罗莱纳州的教堂山 (ChapelHill)社区作为研究对象 ,而现在那里的媒介使用情况也已经发生了巨变。当我们迎来议程设置理论提出 3 0周年的时候 ,教堂山的受众现在面临的信息选择令人惊叹。在 2 0世纪 90年代 ,肖提出 ,美国的大众媒介已经经历了“兴和衰”(riseandfall)。肖认为 ,大众媒体时代结束于 2 0世纪 80年代。议程设置研究是否能像之前的 3 0年那样 ,继续开展下去 ?当受众使用着上百个信息来源时 ,议程设置和民意研究会产生何种变化 ?这是本文将要回答的问题     

科普政策议程设置的多源流模型分析——以《中华人民共和国科学技术普及法》为例

采用"多源流模型"的概念框架,对《中华人民共和国科学技术普及法》的议程设置的问题流、政治流和政策流进行了考察。解决科普工作内在管理问题的需求和各有关部门、地方政府的科普立法的先期实践,法轮功事件的发生则形成了一个触发机制,"政策之窗"被打开,最终导致《科普法》的议程设置和及其制定。     

Transformation or continuation? A critical analysis of the making of the post-2015 education agenda

As the target date of 2015 draws near for both the Education for All and Millennium Development Goals, consultations are well-underway to begin defining the shape and scope of the post-2015 development agenda. Between September 2012 and March 2013, UN Member States, private sector representatives, multilateral development agencies, epistemic communities and non-governmental organisations participated in the Global Thematic Consultation on Education in the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Participants involved emphasised education as a societal good and a fundamental human right. Participants also highlighted the importance of education in addressing broader global challenges, stating that ‘education and learning should be transformative and foster global citizenship, thereby assuming its central role in helping people to forge more just, peaceful, tolerant and inclusive societies’. Such discourse suggests a shift in the objectives and priorities of global education in the post-2015 context. Is it possible that the post-2015 education agenda will represent a counter-hegemonic vision for global education? This paper engages in discursal analysis of the Global Thematic Consultation on Education in the Post-2015 Development Agenda to offer a preliminary answer to this question.