违反辩证法的诡辩方法剖析--负面思维研究之二

在理论上或现实生活中，违反辩证法的诡辩术是多种多样的，但提到方法论上来看，其主要表现为相对主义、绝对主义和折衷主义。对诡辩论的这些方法论特征，必须加以充分的研究和认识，否则在现实生活中就很难识别这些诡辩术，以致受骗上当。     

辩证法与诡辩论辨异

辩证法与形而上学是根本对立的。诡辩论的实质就是形而上学,却常冒充辩证法。辩证法与诡辩论在概念灵活性的转化是否具有条件性、一般与个别的关系及绝对与相对的关系等问题上有根本分歧。厘清这些区别,对于反对诡辩论,坚持科学正确的辩证法具有重要意义。     

The shaman‐trickster's art of misdirection: The rhetoric of Farrakhan and the million men

A charismatic sleight of hand characterizes many rhetorical transactions in African American culture, an adroit manipulation engendered by a history that crushed open confrontation. The skill of the double voiced utterance was appropriated into a performance art which is practiced even today. The Million Man March exemplified the art of “gittin’ ovuh,” an action that simultaneously undercuts one's enemies‐putting something over on someone‐and provides spiritual uplift‐getting over to the promised land. Such a magical performance works by exploiting the power of rhetoric to show and hide. But this is not the same as an exploitation of sophistic technique, because there is an overlapping of the magic of illusion and the magic of the sacred. For contemporary rhetoric this presents an occasion to regard the ethics of deception and the curious phenomenon of a moral sophistry. Louis Farrakhan, although often viewed (perhaps with reason) as either ambitious claimant to national black leadership, or as a skillful exploiter of prejudices, may also be viewed as a master of the art of gittin ovuh, and his call was an incantation that evoked the prodigious response of the “Million Men.” The demonstration on the Washington Mall in October of 1995 enacted a spiritual magic show that has deep cultural roots.     

诡辩产生的历史必然性——负面思维研究之一

诡辩是一种特殊的负面思维形式，诡辩是人类思维发展到一定历史阶段才产生的，其中既有社会历史的原因，又有人类思维与认识发展自身的原因，随着逻辑思维的发展，逻辑规则的确立，有可能克服诡辩这种负面思维现象，尽管诡辩现象还不会消失。     

孟子诡辩探微

《孟子》中的一些篇章逻辑不严,存在诡辩现象,将孟子的诡辩置于论辩中进行微观分析和宏观归纳就会发现,孟子为了阐释自己的理论,以偷梁换柱、移花接木和穿凿附会、无类比附这两种手段与对手进行论辩。孟子的诡辩符合个人性格,同时,《孟子》处于语录体和论说体的过渡期,诡辩也是体制使然。     

简论现象学视域中相对主义、诡辩论和辩证法的关系

相对主义、诡辩论和辩证法这三个哲学范畴经常被常识化理解,其真正哲学内涵长期被遮蔽。运用现象学的方法去“直观”它们,从历史的角度进行现象学的溯源式读解。理性地分析它们的逻辑层次。才能厘清相对主义、诡辩论和辩证法的真正关系。     

辩证法与诡辩论区别探讨

唯物辩证法与诡辩论有严格的界限,在实际生活中也有明显区别。表现如下:使用概念上;一般和个别关系上;运动和静止关系上;真理二重性上;人性与对社会发展态度上。     

奥斯卡·王尔德：传统的非传统主义者

奥斯卡·王尔德在论现代性、艺术的形式批评以及艺术模仿论等诸多方面．都提出了甚至是颠覆性的创作主张。王尔德对形式的推崇达到无以复加的地步,在他看来,古希腊批评精神就是整个现代艺术批评的源头,而其关于艺术模仿的颠覆性观点则预见性地与以解构主义为代表的后现代主义相契合。王尔德的颠覆性透过传统的外衣而得以彰显。