排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Lisa Romero 《Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian》2013,32(2):89-90
No abstract available for this article. 相似文献
3.
The purpose of this paper is to address the question of whethercomputer source code is speech protected by the First Amendmentto the United States Constitution or whether it is merelyfunctional, a ``machine', designed to fulfill a set task andtherefore bereft of protection. The answer to this question is acomplex one. Unlike all other forms of ``speech' computer sourcecode holds a unique place in the law: it can be copyrighted, likea book and it can be patented like a machine or process.Case law, intellectual property law and encryption exportregulations all reflect this contradictory dichotomy. 相似文献
1