Regret for Complaint Withholding

This study examines regret for withholding relational complaints. The study sample of 393 participants completed measures of irritant frequency, irritant importance, relational intimacy, emotional distress from withholding, and regret for withholding. Irritant frequency mediated the positive relationship between length of withholding and irritant importance. This process predicted less intimacy and more emotional distress from withholding, the latter of which related to regret. Alternative paths were also found between length of withholding and regret. Results offer important implications for the role of regret management in hurtful confrontations and may inform other avoidance forms.     

“安全阀”如何保安全——对信访制度的思考

中国特色的信访制度的产生和发展有其历史必然性。在近五十年的发展历程中,信访制度在党和政府沟通人民群众方面发挥了重要的历史作用。但新时期以来,随着社会转型期各种新的社会问题的涌现,信访制度逐渐演变为一种权利救治的制度。虽然目前信访制度与我国法治社会建设目标有矛盾之处,但仍有其存在的价值,问题在于如何促使其向规范化方向发展。     

对问体的传承和异化考辨

对问既指文章的一种构造形式,又指古代的一种文体,学界对对问的研究往往出现概念上的模糊.汉詹以来,作为文体的对问,结构的设置有规范,词采内容的表达有定式.对问不但是汉唐写作牢骚文章所运用的典型文体,而且在唐宋以后,其结构和思想内涵也渗入到诗词的创作中,异化为对问结构的诗词.对问不论作为一种文体还是一种结构,施之文学作品,表情迭意或迂回曲深,或酣畅淋漓,在古典文学作品的各类体式里非常引人注目.     

“诗可以怨”与晚清文学革命

古典诗学中,＂诗可以群＂与＂诗可以怨＂是很难分开的。＂怨＂是诗人以文学为手段来进行政治实践的方式,是为了更好地实现＂群＂的价值伦理,但它受到＂止乎礼＂的限制,＂群怨俱宜＂正是这种态度在美学上的表现。而到了晚清,＂怨＂彻底从＂礼＂的束缚中暴发出来,以＂革命＂的激进方式介入到政治实践当中。＂革命＂成为一种激进的美学态度,而新文学的精神正是那种激进的革命精神和批判意识。     

现有高校学生申诉制度的缺失与对策

由于缺乏立法的支持和对制度本身的深刻理解,运行多年的高校学生申诉制度依然存在完善的广泛空间,本文就此提出构建一部高校学生申诉法、重组高校学生申诉处理委员会、培养中委会委员的法律方法等若干策略,以期让高校学生申诉制度的治权（权力）和维权（权利）功能真正达到统一。     

Backstage accounting in preschool: analysing dealing with complaints as ‘rehearsing away’ professional knowledge

Citizens of modern societies must trust a broad range of systems and professionals. When distrust arises, professionals are expected to be accountable. This paper draws on conversational material from a preschool team meeting. When a preschool work team prepares to meet a parent who has complained about their recurring neglect to change her child’s nappies ‘in time’, they are found: (1) to carefully review the encounter with the client, (2) in a team-building fashion, to select suitable accounts to offer ‘front stage’ and (3) to internally justify their selection of accounts. Our results indicate that work team members who engaged in backstage rehearsal author the organisation for building trust and, simultaneously ‘rehearse away’ what should remain the organisations’ secrets. Communicating the intent to satisfy was deemed more important than was using evidence from their professional knowledge base.     

Child sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church in Germany: Comparison of victim-impact data collected through church-sponsored and government-sponsored programs

At around the same time in 2010, the German government and the Roman Catholic Church in Germany each set up a critical incident reporting system (CIRS) to gather information on child sexual abuse that had taken place within the Church. The objective in both cases was to solicit stories from victims and former victims and allow them to have input into a review process. The existence of these two similar systems, one initiated by the institution involved in the abuse and the other by an independent entity, provided an opportunity to compare the background and motivation of victims who chose to communicate through one channel or the other. Data were obtained on a total of 927 individuals, 571 through the church CIRS and 356 through the government CIRS, who had reported that they had experienced childhood sexual abuse within the Roman Catholic Church. Some differences were found between the two groups in terms of gender, the reported frequency of abuse, and the desire for compensation. These differences highlight the need for an effective complaint management system to offer not just one but complementary channels of communication. In addition, the findings confirm the feasibility and value of a CIRS approach and the use of so-called ‘citizen science’ in politically driven review processes.     

高校学生处分申诉证据规则研究

大学生申诉作为一个依靠证据去裁决的行为,证据规则就应当是学生申诉制度设计中的一个核心内容。我国目前在学生申诉证据规则的系统研究上尚属空白。文章从不同裁决行为的证据规则选择入手,探讨了学生申诉证据规则设定的基本思路,论述了学生申诉中的证明责任、证明标准以及证据效力等问题,并简要分析了学生自认和孤证处分等特殊处分的处理。     

Identifying the characteristics of child sexual abuse cases associated with the child or child's parents withdrawing the complaint

Most child sexual abuse cases do not result in a full trial or guilty plea; rather, case attrition occurs at earlier stages of the criminal justice system. One reason for the attrition of these cases is the withdrawal of complaints, by children or their caregivers. The aim of the current study was to determine the case characteristics associated with complaint withdrawal in child sexual abuse cases by the child or his or her parents once a report has been made to authorities. All child sexual abuse incidents reported to authorities in one jurisdiction of Australia in 2011 were analyzed (N = 659). A multinomial logistic regression was used to predict the following case outcomes: (1) withdrawn by the child or his or her parents, (2) exited for other reasons (e.g., the alleged offender was not identified, the child refused to be interviewed), and (3) resulted in a charge. Five predictors significantly added to the prediction of case outcome: child age, suspect gender, suspect age, child–suspect relationship, and abuse frequency. These results should contribute to the design of interventions in order to reduce complaint withdrawals if these withdrawals are not in the child's best interests.     

The Role of Family Verbal Aggression and Taking Conflict Personally in Romantic Relationship Complaint Avoidance

This study examined complaint avoidance in adult romantic relationships as a function of both exposure to family verbal aggression in childhood and taking conflict personally. Four hundred thirty-seven college students completed measures assessing their histories of family verbal aggression, complaint avoidance behaviors, and tendencies to take conflict personally. Results indicated that a history of family verbal aggression and three components of taking conflict personally, namely positive relational effects, negative relational effects, and like/dislike valence, were negatively associated with complaint avoidance. In addition, a history of family verbal aggression was positively associated with positive relational effects, negative relational effects, and like/dislike valence. The relationship between a history of family verbal aggression and complaint avoidance, however, was not mediated by taking conflict personally.