首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论现行回避制度——以刑事诉讼法为例
引用本文:陆红. 论现行回避制度——以刑事诉讼法为例[J]. 南京晓庄学院学报, 2004, 20(1): 63-67
作者姓名:陆红
作者单位:南京晓庄学院,法政系,江苏,南京,210017
摘    要:回避制度的价值追求是程序公正.以刑事诉讼法为代表的我国现行回避制度,对回避的理由和种类、适用人员和相应程序有相关规定,对实际境遇有相应解释.但回避制度很少被付诸实践;自行回避的自我约束机制不存在;对什么是利害关系没有明确解释;回避的范围太窄;没有规定审判委员会的回避情形等.以上现象有违程序公正理念,对司法实践有硬伤性损害.改革现有回避制度,应建立法官公示制度,强化自我约束机制;建立预先审核程序;学习他国经验,建立无因回避制度.

关 键 词:程序公正  回避制度  评价与对策
文章编号:1009-7902(2004)01-0063-05
修稿时间:2003-11-11

On the Current Challengs System- Taking the Criminal Procedure Law for Example
Lu Hong. On the Current Challengs System- Taking the Criminal Procedure Law for Example[J]. Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang College, 2004, 20(1): 63-67
Authors:Lu Hong
Abstract:The aim of the challenge system is the fair procedure.The current challenge system represented by the criminal procedure law explains its reasons,personnel concerned and its stipulations.But the challenge system is seldom put into practice.And there is not any self-restraining mechanism for the system.Neither is there any explicit explanation of the stake;the scope of the system is too narrow;there is no stipulation for the judicial committee to practice the system.All this goes against the idea of fair procedure,and will do harm to the judicial procedure.So,we must reform the current challenge system,establish the system of promulgation of the judge,strengthen self-restraining mechanism,establish the inquisitional procedure,and learn from other countries and establish the imperative challenge system.
Keywords:fair procedure  challenge system  evaluatiion and measures  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号