首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Mining patterns of author orders in scientific publications
Authors:Bing He  Ying Ding  Erjia Yan
Institution:1. School of Business Administration, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, R.S., 90010-460, Brazil;2. Prometeo Researcher, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, University of Cuenca, Ecuador;3. Graduate Program in Economics, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, S.C., 88049-970, Brazil;1. Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, UK;2. Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, NJ, United States;1. Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;2. School of Education and Communication in Engineering Sciences (ECE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 100 44, Sweden;3. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;4. Institute for Education and Information Sciences, IBW, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp B-2000, Belgium;5. KU Leuven, Department of Mathematics, Leuven B-3000, Belgium;1. Chinese Academy of Science and Education Evaluation (CASEE), Hangzhou Dianzi University, Xiasha, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, PR China;2. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada;3. Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies (OST), Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur la Science et la Technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
Abstract:The author order of multi-authored papers can reveal subtle patterns of scientific collaboration and provide insights on the nature of credit assignment among coauthors. This article proposes a sequence-based perspective on scientific collaboration. Using frequently occurring sequences as the unit of analysis, this study explores (1) what types of sequence patterns are most common in the scientific collaboration at the level of authors, institutions, U.S. states, and nations in Library and Information Science (LIS); and (2) the productivity (measured by number of papers) and influence (measured by citation counts) of different types of sequence patterns. Results show that (1) the productivity and influence approximately follow the power law for frequent sequences in the four levels of analysis; (2) the productivity and influence present a significant positive correlation among frequent sequences, and the strength of the correlation increases with the level of integration; (3) for author-level, institution-level, and state-level frequent sequences, short geographical distances between the authors usually co-present with high productivities, while long distances tend to co-occur with large citation counts; (4) for author-level frequent sequences, the pattern of “the more productive and prestigious authors ranking ahead” is the one with the highest productivity and the highest influence; however, in the rest of the levels of analysis, the pattern with the highest productivity and the highest influence is the one with “the less productive and prestigious institutions/states/nations ranking ahead.”
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号