首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

短文听写题型不同的作答方式对CET-4考生答题过程的影响研究
作者单位:;1.河南城建学院外国语学院
摘    要:为探讨作答方式对考生答题过程的影响,验证听写题型的效度,采用即时追述和访谈的研究方法,对36名EFL考生短文听写时的答题过程进行分析。研究表明:虽然四组考生听写的总体得分差异并不显著,但在答题过程中使用母语作答的第三组考生使用了更多的策略,能较好地理解输入的信息和短文大意,并受与构念无关的因素影响较小,而第四组受试在没有语境的情况下,对语义的理解不深刻,使用的策略最少,测验材料没有较好的效度和区分度。另外,四组考生的实际答题表现与听写的指令要求也并不一致,表明指令的合理性存在问题。

关 键 词:CET-4  短文听写  测试方式  答题过程

Study on the Effects of Different Response Formats of Dictation Test on CET-4 Testees' Test-taking Processes
Institution:,School of Foreign Languages,Henan University of Urban Construction
Abstract:The study investigates the processes of 36 EFL test-takers in completing a compound dictation test through analysis of their verbal protocols obtained immediately after the test and retrospective interviews,to explore whether and how different response formats affect their test-taking processes and validity of this test. Findings are as follows: four group test-takers' actual performance does not relate to the instructions given in the dictation test,which may raise doubts over the effectiveness of the instructions,posing a potential threat to test validity. Testees of G3 tend to use various strategies to have a better understanding of the listening input,and they appeared to be less influenced by construct-irrelevant factors,which proved the validity of listening test. While G4 testees' understanding of information and strategy use was the least,their test appeared not to have good validity and differentiation.
Keywords:CET-4  compound dictation  response formats  test-taking processes
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号