首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

考虑碳排放的物流配送中心竞争选址
引用本文:盛丽丽,汪传旭.考虑碳排放的物流配送中心竞争选址[J].上海海事大学学报,2014,35(3):51-56.
作者姓名:盛丽丽  汪传旭
作者单位:上海海事大学经济管理学院,上海,201306
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(71373157);上海市大文科研究生学术新人培育项目(wk2013012);上海海事大学研究生创新基金(2013ycx025)
摘    要:在考虑物流配送中心新建、扩建、库存及运输中产生的碳排放及其成本的基础上,对低碳背景下物流配送中心的竞争选址进行研究.该方法首先建立垄断条件下物流配送中心的选址模型;然后建立竞争条件下两个公司的Stackelberg博弈选址模型.在此博弈选址模型中,领导者从利润最大化角度进行选址,跟随者通过改变自己配送中心规模的大小参与竞争.算例分析结果表明,该模型能为两个公司的竞争选址问题提供较好的选址决策和配送方案,竞争条件下市场总利润小于垄断条件下的市场总利润.

关 键 词:物流  碳排放  配送中心  竞争选址
收稿时间:2013/8/28 0:00:00
修稿时间:1/3/2014 12:00:00 AM

Competitive location of logistics distribution centers considering carbon emission
shenglili and wangchanxu.Competitive location of logistics distribution centers considering carbon emission[J].Journal of Shanghai Maritime University,2014,35(3):51-56.
Authors:shenglili and wangchanxu
Abstract:sponding cost from the construction, expansion, inventory, and transportation, the competitive location of logistics distribution centers is studied. First, a location model for logistics distribution centers under monopoly is established, and then a Stackelberg game location model of two companies under competitive condition is established. In the game location model, the leader decides on locations from profit maximization angle, while the follower competes with the leader by changing the size of its own distribution centers. The results of example analysis show that: the model can provide better location decision and distribution scheme for the competitive location of two companies; the total market profit under competitive condition is less than that under monopoly.
Keywords:logistics  carbon emission  distribution center  competitive location
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《上海海事大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《上海海事大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号