| 对经典竞技规范伦理学的反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘卓 李伟民. 对经典竞技规范伦理学的反思[J]. 上海体育学院学报, 1997, 21(3): 14-18 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘卓 李伟民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海体育学院研究生部 200438上海(刘卓)，上海师范大学体育系 上海200234(李伟民)，山东师范大学体育系 济南250014(张志勇) |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家教委优秀年轻教师基金资助课题 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 经典竞技规范伦理学中的竞技规范,仅仅是可供选择的对象,而不是无可选择的事实。因为存在着两个问题;即任一竞技规范的合理性需要被判定,竞技规范之间可能出现的冲突。“应该”不仅表现出了规劝的软弱性,更为致命的是它本身的无根性。这种无根性使得任一竞技规范系统表现为或是不相容的,或是不完备的,或是不可靠的,因而是无效的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 经典竞技规范伦理学 应该 竞技规范 怀疑原则 无根性 |
Reflection of Classical Normative Ethics in Sports |
| |
| Liu Zhuo Li Wei-min Zhang Zhi-yong. Reflection of Classical Normative Ethics in Sports[J]. Journal of Shanghai Physical Education Institute, 1997, 21(3): 14-18 |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Zhuo Li Wei-min Zhang Zhi-yong |
| |
| Abstract: | The competition norm of classical normative ethics in sports is only an object to be chosen, not the fact which could not be selected, since there are two problems: first, the rationality of any sport norm needs to be judged; second, the conflicts possibly occur among the sport norms, "Ought to be" not only presents the weakness of advice but its fatal rootless-ness. This kind of rootlessness makes any sport normative system uncompitable or uncompleted or unreliable, and therefore unworkable. |
| |
| Keywords: | classical normative ethics in sports, " ought to be" , sport norm, suspicious principle, rootlessness |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
