Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change |
| |
Authors: | Soniya Gadgil Timothy J Nokes-MalachMichelene TH Chi |
| |
Institution: | a Department of Psychology, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, United States b Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Prior research on conceptual change has identified multiple kinds of misconceptions at different levels of representational complexity including false beliefs, flawed mental models, and incorrect ontological categories. We hypothesized that conceptual change of a mental model requires change in the system of relations between the features of the prior model. To test this hypothesis, we compared instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the mental model level called holistic confrontation - in which the learner compares and contrasts a diagram of his or her flawed mental model to an expert model - to instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the false belief level - in which the learner is prompted to self-explain the expert model alone. We found evidence that participants who engaged in holistic confrontation were more likely to acquire a correct mental model, and a deeper understanding of the systems of relations in the model than those who were prompted to self-explain the expert model. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for science instruction. |
| |
Keywords: | Learning Conceptual change Comparison Mental models Self-explanation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |