| 修辞学是否属于边缘学科讨论述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曹德和. 修辞学是否属于边缘学科讨论述评[J]. 毕节学院学报, 2002, 20(3): 1-14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7059.2002.03.001 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曹德和 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏教育学院中文系,江苏,南京,010008 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对于修辞学是否具有跨学科性质,修辞学界存在不同看法.否定派理由有五点,肯定派根据有三条,文章对此作了全面述评.文章指出,肯定派意见难以证伪,但"边缘学科"就名称来说并非尽善尽美.文章建议将"边缘学科"名称留给文艺修辞学等,而把通通常理解的修辞学称作"综合学科".文章最后就这场讨论的意义作了总结.
|
| 关 键 词： | 讨论述评 修辞学 纯语言研究 跨学科研究 边缘学科 综合学科 |
A Review of the Discussion about Whether Rhetoric Is a Marginal Discipline |
| |
| Cao Dehe. A Review of the Discussion about Whether Rhetoric Is a Marginal Discipline[J]. Journal of Bijie University, 2002, 20(3): 1-14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7059.2002.03.001 |
| |
| Authors: | Cao Dehe |
| |
| Abstract: | It is a controversy in the rhetorical circle whether or not rhetoric has an interdisciplinary feature. The cons hold five reasons, and the pros hold three. This article makes an overall review of the viewpoints of both parties. It maintains that it is difficult to prove the positive opinion wrong,but the term of "interdisciplinary course" is not perfect. It suggests that"interdisciplinary course" be kept for the artistic rhetoric and so no,and the rhetoric undertood in the common sense be referred to as"integrated course".The article finally sums up the significance of the discussion. |
| |
| Keywords: | a review of the discussion rhetoric pure linguistic research interdisciplinary course integrated course |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
