庄子之“道”与海德格尔的“本体”之思——从词源学的角度

庄子道之含义颇为丰富，概言之有“行、言、有、无”之义，其道之所蕴涵的“无”之义，乃凸现其哲学的创生性、开放性。无独有偶，二十世纪德国大哲学家海德格尔通过对西方“本体、存在”的反思，亦得出其“本体”（存在）意味着“说、自然、行（通达）、隐”之意。庄子“道”之“真际”与海氏的“真理去蔽”说更有着天然的神似——无论“去蔽”还是“真际”皆在“存在”中展开，“存在”既是道的运行状态，亦为“人”的生存之域。无疑，探究庄子与海德格尔的本体之道对于贯通中西哲学有着重要的意义，

Taoism of Zhuangzi and Ontology of Heidegger --From the Perspective of Etymology

Taoism of Zhuangzi contains various connotations, such as ways, saying, being and nothing, among which ＂nothing＂ reveals the creativity and opening of philosophy. Heidegger, the famous German philosopher in the 20th century, also drew the same conclusion that ontology＂ means ＂saying, nature, ways and forbearing＂. There are similarities between truth in Taoism of ZhuangZi and Aletheia of Heidegger, both of whom are discussed on the basis of ＂being＂. ＂Being＂ is not only the status of the Taoism, but also the circumstances for human beings to live in. The probation into Taoism and ontology will shed lights on understanding both Chinese and the western philosophies thoroughly.