| 我国驰名商标认定与保护模式比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周俊强.我国驰名商标认定与保护模式比较研究[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,38(1):64-67. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周俊强 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽师范大学,政法学院,安徽,芜湖,241003 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金重大招标项目(07&ZD006);;安徽省社会科学基金项目(AHSK07-08D86) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国驰名商标的认定与保护存在司法与行政双轨并行的现象。对于行政与司法两种模式，就一具体个案而言，前者认定与保护的主体分离；后者认定与保护的主体一致。就认定涉案的范围与保护可用的手段观之，行政模冬涉案的范围较窄，保护可用的手段有限；司法模式认定涉寨的范围较广，保护可用的手段充分。从认定与保护的效力上看，驰名商标的司法与行政认定，具有基于驰名动态性的异案同效和基于司法终决权的同案异效的特征。
|
| 关 键 词： | 驰名商标 认定 保护 模式 |
Comparative Study of Modes of Determination and Protection of Well-known Trademarks in China |
| |
| ZHOU Jun-qiang.Comparative Study of Modes of Determination and Protection of Well-known Trademarks in China[J].Journal of Anhui Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2010,38(1):64-67. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Jun-qiang |
| |
| Institution: | School of Political Science and Law;Anhui Normal University;Wuhu Anhui 241003;China |
| |
| Abstract: | In China,there is the judicial and administrative modes paralleled in wellknown trademarks' protection and determination.In the specific case,the former is isolated from the subject while the latter is consistent with it.From the perspectives of the scope and approaches,the administrative mode is narrower and the means of protection is limited.Considering effectiveness,the determination of wellknown trademarks has the characters of dynamic effectiveness in one case and different effectiveness in separate ca... |
| |
| Keywords: | wellknown trademark determination protection mode |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
