基于主体自律的网络行为管理模式及其对中国的启示

网络行为和现实世界行为存在差异，在不同偏好和信念下的网络行为体现着不同的特征，而相应的约束和治理机制也存在差异。本文对比了各国网络行为管理模式差异，对我国的网络行为管理模式提出了建议。网络行为管理模式可以分为行业自律政府指导型和政府严格控制型两种，英美主要通过行业自律和政府服务指导实现对互联网的监管，我国主要依靠政府的规制和司法实现互联网监控，是典型的政府主导体制，存在多个部门从不同角度对互联网进行管制，而行业自律的作用较弱。未来可以更多发挥行业自律的作用，提高政府规制的开放性。

The Management Mode of Network Based on Self-discipline and Its Implications for China

There are differences between network behaviors and real-world behaviors. Different preferences and beliefs reflect the different characteristics of network behaviors and the corresponding constraints and governance mechanisms are also differences. This paper compares the differences between countries in the network behavior management model and proposes on China＆#39;s network management model. There are two network behavior management models which are industry self-government guidance and government strictly controlled. Britain and the United States guide the network behaviors mainly through industry self-regulation and government regulation. Our country monitor the network behaviors mainly rely on government regulation and judicial and it’s the typical government-led system. There are multiple departments on Internet regulation from different angles. And the role of industry self-regulation is weak. We can improve the role of industry self-regulation in the future and improve the openness of government regulation.