| 情境语义学解悖方案评析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 贾国恒.情境语义学解悖方案评析[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008,36(5). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 贾国恒 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学语言与认知研究中心,杭州310028;新乡学院社科部,河南,新乡,453000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金，教育部人文社会科学研究基地基金，河南社科联项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以奥斯汀式命题观为基础、奥斯汀式阐释为形式,情境语义学解悖方案合乎直觉地解决了以说谎者悖论为首的一批语义悖论.通过对比分析奥斯汀式阐释与罗素式阐释,可以看出,说谎者悖论产生的根源是忽视了情境或情境要素参量.情境语义学解悖方案对语形悖论,包括罗素悖论和合信悖论等也具有推广价值.
|
| 关 键 词： | 奥斯汀式阐释 罗素式阐释 现实世界 扩充 |
Analysis of Situation Semantics Solution to Paradoxes |
| |
| JIA Guo-heng.Analysis of Situation Semantics Solution to Paradoxes[J].Journal of Anhui Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2008,36(5). |
| |
| Authors: | JIA Guo-heng |
| |
| Institution: | JIA Guo-heng(Center for the Study of Language , Cognition,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310028,Xinxiang College,Xinxiang Henan 453000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on Austinian propositional view,thesituation semantics solution to paradoxes,in the form of Austinian Account,solves intuitively a number of semantic paradoxes whose head is the liar paradox.By contrast analyses between Austinian Account and Russellian Account,it can be seen that the root of the liar is the negligence of the parameter of situation or situation constituent.Furthermore,situation semantics solution can be extended to syntactic paradoxes,including Russell paradox,and doxic paradoxes. |
| |
| Keywords: | Austinian Account Russellian Account real world extension |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
