E |
| |
Authors: | Gregory J. Cizek |
| |
Affiliation: | Professor of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, School of Education, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill, 110 Peabody Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3500;e-mail: . His specializations are standard setting and testing policy. |
| |
Abstract: | This article responds to two critiques of an earlier article on the unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. The exchange of viewpoints suggests that the successful resolution of current policy debates surrounding such testing and companion accountability systems rests on the ability to: recognize, document, and disseminate instances of real learning gains; develop improved methods and assessment systems that provide instructional relevance and utility of test results; and negotiate a balance between the role of large-scale assessment in identifying achievement deficits and the responsibility and resources that educational systems have to redress identified deficiencies. |
| |
Keywords: | high-stakes testing testing consequences stesting policy |
|
|