首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


E
Authors:Gregory J. Cizek
Affiliation:Professor of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, School of Education, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill, 110 Peabody Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3500;e-mail: . His specializations are standard setting and testing policy.
Abstract:This article responds to two critiques of an earlier article on the unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. The exchange of viewpoints suggests that the successful resolution of current policy debates surrounding such testing and companion accountability systems rests on the ability to: recognize, document, and disseminate instances of real learning gains; develop improved methods and assessment systems that provide instructional relevance and utility of test results; and negotiate a balance between the role of large-scale assessment in identifying achievement deficits and the responsibility and resources that educational systems have to redress identified deficiencies.
Keywords:high-stakes testing    testing consequences    stesting policy
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号