首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Shoe Shopping and the Reliability Coefficient
Abstract:Editor's Introduction. Reliability Versus Accuracy: A Critical Distinction Test reliability coefficients traditionally have been used to judge the quality of measurement. And, reliability coefficients of .90 have often been considered adequate to assure the quality for standardized testing and large-scale assessment programs. However, a test reliability of .90 (or above) does not ensure that individual test scores, such as national percentile ranks, are accurate. Consider, for example, a mathematics test with a reliability of .90 and imagine a student taking that test whose true score is at the 50th percentile; that is, we know that the student's actual capability is at that level. The probability is less than one third (.309) that when the student takes the test, he or she will obtain a score within 5 percentile points of his or her true score, the 50th percentile (Rogosa 1999a, 1999b). The following informal example attempts to explain why high test reliability does not indicate good accuracy for an individual score, without the encumbrances of percentile rank scoring, complex measurement models, and other technical detail. Dedicated to Al Bundy-A man who cares as much about good measurement as he does about his own children.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号