革命文学家与鲁迅的分歧

为了文学上的意识形态革命,革命文学家们对国内文坛诸多大家展开了批评,他们选择鲁迅作为主要批判对象。革命文学家与鲁迅的分歧主要有两个方面。一是革命文学家的身份问题。由于他们的非无产阶级身份,认为只要具备无产阶级的意识就能成为革命文学家;鲁迅则强调革命文学家自身的革命经验对于革命文学创作的重要性。二是革命文学与时代和革命的关系问题。革命文学家突出强调文学对政治的想象和表达,相信文学是阶级解放的武器;鲁迅则坚持文学自身的审美属性,反对文学被工具化,而且他认为时代是黑暗的,民众也是麻木的,文学暂时无从去表现革命的时代精神,文学也无法承担阶级解放的重任。此番论争为革命文学争取到了初步的生存权,而且革命文学作为一种新的文学观念为现代文学开拓了新的审美空间。

The Discrepancies between Revolutionary Writers and LU Xun

For the sake of revolution in the ideology of literature,revolutionary writers conducted critics on many master writers in China,and they focused their attention on LU Xun.The discrepancies between revolutionary writers and LU Xun mainly include the following two aspects.The first is the identity of revolutionary writers.Because the non-proletariat status of revolutionary writers,they thought that they were revolutionary writers as long as they had the awareness of proletariats,while LU Xun emphasized the importance of inner experience of revolutionary writers for revolutionary literal creation.The second one is the relationship between revolutionary literature and times.Revolutionary writers put great emphasis on the imagination and expression of literature on politics,and they believed that literature was the weapon for social class liberation.Meanwhile,LU Xun insisted on the inner esthetics of literature and he believed that then society was dark and dirty.