| 港台与内地破产立法体例之比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔海滨.港台与内地破产立法体例之比较研究[J].济宁师范专科学校学报,2004,25(2):57-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔海滨 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 济宁师专政治系 山东济宁272025 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 港台与内地破产立法体例相比，前者有三个优点：一是立法体例统一、制定了统一破产法典，二是内容充实、法条完备、具有可操作性，三是设立了一些有特色的制度；而后者有两点缺陷：一是立法体例零乱，二是内容单薄、法条较少、缺乏可操作性。内地应借鉴港台之优点，以完善破产立法体例。
|
| 关 键 词： | 破产立法体例 香港 台湾省 比较研究 立法体例 债权人利益 内容 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-1877(2004)02-0057-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年11月25 |
On the Comparative Study of the Legislation Style of Bankruptcy between HongKong, Taiwan and the Mainland of China |
| |
| CUI Hai-bin.On the Comparative Study of the Legislation Style of Bankruptcy between HongKong, Taiwan and the Mainland of China[J].Journal of Jining Teachers College,2004,25(2):57-60. |
| |
| Authors: | CUI Hai-bin |
| |
| Abstract: | Contrasted with the legislation style of laws of bankruptcy between Hongkong, Taiwan and the mainland of China, The former has three advantages: First, unity of legislation style by establishing uniform statute books of bankruptcy; second, rich contents and perfect provisions with high portability; third, establishment of special institutions and regulations. The latter exlists two imperfections: confusing legislation style and fewer provisions with lack of portability. To perfect itself, the latter should borrow some advantages from the former. |
| |
| Keywords: | HongKong and Taiwan the mainland the legislation style of laws of bankruptcy contrast |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
