职业足球无正当理由终止合同赔偿的CAS法理

无正当理由终止合同赔偿是职业足球的常见问题。通过解决此类争议,国际体育仲裁院(CAS)形成了无正当理由终止合同赔偿的独特法理。采用案例分析法、比较研究法和归纳法,对职业足球无正当理由终止合同赔偿的CAS法理进行研究。研究认为,CAS首先适用特殊条款和不可抗力原则,然后适用"积极利益"原则并根据客观标准计算赔偿,通过遵循基于公平、诚信的"有约必守"原则和适用"积极利益"原则的威慑作用,以维持职业足球的合同稳定。通过对涉中国俱乐部的典型判例进行分析,提出:适用中国法律在理论上是可行的,但实际上适用中国法律冲突导致适用国际足球规则成为一种共识;对于CAS仲裁可能的中国当事方,不能忽略公平和诚信原则,应遵守国际足球规则、CAS法理和中国法律的基本原则。

CAS Jurisprudence on Compensation for Termination of Contract without Just Cause in Professional Football

Compensation for termination of contract without just cause is a common issue in professional football. By resolving such disputes, the court of arbitration for sport(CAS) has formed a unique jurisprudence for termination of contracts without just cause. Adopting case analysis, comparison and induction, this paper studied the CAS jurisprudence of compensation for professional football termination of contract without just cause, and found that for the compensation for professional football termination of contract without just cause, CAS first applied the special terms and the principle of force majeure, then applied the principle of "positive interest" and calculated the compensation according to objective standards. Through deterrence effect by applying the principle of "positive interests" and following the principle of "pacta sunt servanda" based on fairness and good faith, CAS maintained the contract stability of professional football. By analyzing the typical cases involving the Chinese clubs, this paper put forward that it was feasible to apply the Chinese law to the compensation for professional football breach of contract in theory, but the actual professional football contract conflicted with the applicable Chinese law, resulting in the application of the international football rules becoming a common consensus. At present, the domestic football rules lagged behind the development of the international football rules. Therefore, relevant rules should be revised in time to keep up with the development process of the international rules. For the possible Chinese parties to CAS arbitration, the principles of fairness and good faith should not be ignored. They should abide by the international football rules, CAS jurisprudence and the basic principles of Chinese law and sign contracts in a standardized manner.