| 论质与本质 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李霄山.论质与本质[J].培训与研究,2003,20(1):44-45. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李霄山 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 海军工程大学基础部政治教研室，湖北武汉430033 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在马克思主义哲学中，质与本质是两个不同层面的范畴。实际工作中，许多研究学往往混淆了它们的基本内涵，甚至把它们作为相等同的概念，以至于不能深刻领会马克思主义哲学的基本原理。为此，本试图运用历史与逻辑相统一的科学方法，来理清两在本体论和认识论上的内涵及其异同。
|
| 关 键 词： | 质 本质 马克思主义哲学 范畴 本体论 认识论 规律 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-1687(2003)01-0044-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年12月10 |
On Quality and Essence |
| |
| LI Xiao-shan.On Quality and Essence[J].Training and Research-Journal of Hubei College of Education,2003,20(1):44-45. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Xiao-shan |
| |
| Abstract: | Quality and essence are different categories in the philosophy of Marxism. In fact, many research scholars usually are confused with their basic connotations, sometimes even taking them as the identical conception. As a result we cannot understand deeply the basic theory of the philosophy of Marxism. For this reason, we try to discern their connotations and variances on ontology and epistemology by the scientific method of the unity of history and logic. |
| |
| Keywords: | quality essence law category |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
