首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Fairness and Consequential Validity of Teacher Work Samples
Authors:Peter Denner  Antony Norman  Shu-Yuan Lin
Institution:(1) College of Education, Idaho State University, P.O. Box 8059, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;(2) Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA;(3) Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA
Abstract:Acknowledging the necessity to establish the fairness and consequential validity of teacher candidate performance assessments when they are used to make high-stakes decisions impacting entry into the profession, we investigated whether there were any adverse results from the use of the Renaissance Teacher Work Sample (TWS) assessment at two universities as a consequence of the age, gender, or race/ethnicity of teacher candidates. We also investigated education program and program entrance requirements, such as Praxis I scores, and measures of grade point average, as general predictors of TWS success. The findings indicated no disparate impact or adverse consequences based on the gender, age, or race/ethnicity of the teacher candidates. Selected variables did predict a moderate amount of the variance of the TWS total scores of both preinterns and student-teaching interns. The process used to determine the value implications of the results was also discussed.
Keywords:Teacher performance assessment  Teacher work samples  Validity
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号