| 基于案例分析探讨编辑的怀疑和求证态度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘萍,马劲. 基于案例分析探讨编辑的怀疑和求证态度[J]. 编辑学报, 2017, 29(5): 427-428. DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2017.05.006 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘萍 马劲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国药房杂志社,400042,重庆;中国药房杂志社,400042,重庆 |
| |
| 基金项目： | [KH*2/3D]基于案例分析探讨编辑的怀疑和求证态度[KH*2/3D]〖JZ |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在编辑稿件中,编辑工作者对稿件中的内容信息持怀疑和求证态度至关重要,可确保科学知识的正确传播.本文以作者在编辑工作中发现的一个不当分类的知识信息点为案例,阐明编辑在编辑工作中应当如何进行怀疑和求证.
|
| 关 键 词： | 编辑 怀疑 求证 案例分析 |
| 收稿时间： | 2017-02-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2017-02-03 |
Analysis and discuss on editor's skepticism and validation based on a case |
| |
| LIU Ping and MA Jin. Analysis and discuss on editor's skepticism and validation based on a case[J]. Acta Editologica, 2017, 29(5): 427-428. DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2017.05.006 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Ping and MA Jin |
| |
| Affiliation: | China Pharmacy Journal Publishing House,400042,Chongqing,China and China Pharmacy Journal Publishing House,400042,Chongqing,China |
| |
| Abstract: | It is very important of the editor to have the skepticism and validation in editorial work on the content of the information,it will ensure the scientific knowledge spread correctly.This paper based on a case that of improper classification of knowledge points occurred in editorial work to discuss how to suspect and verify in editorial work. |
| |
| Keywords: | editor skepticism validation case analysis |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载全文 |
|
