首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

梁实秋、鲁迅人性阶级性论争溯源
引用本文:陆道夫.梁实秋、鲁迅人性阶级性论争溯源[J].广东技术师范学院学报,2002(1):29-36.
作者姓名:陆道夫
作者单位:北京师范大学国家人文社科基地文艺学研究中心 北京100875
摘    要:在 2 1世纪 30年代初的中国现代文学史上 ,新月派理论家梁实秋与鲁迅等“左翼”作家就文学的“人性”与“阶级性”问题展开了激烈的论争。这场论争涉及到新文学的政治选择、文化选择、审美选择以及有关文学的本质、功用和价值等问题 ,具有丰富的文化内涵和理论意义。因此 ,梳理总结梁实秋和鲁迅两人不同的人性论旨趣及其理论渊源 ,对于我们今天从当时的历史语境去重新评价这场论争的功过得失 ,或者对于当下的中国现代文学的文化建构和现代批评形态的生成都有重要的参考价值

关 键 词:人性  阶级性  论争  文学  理论
文章编号:1009-2803(2002)01-0029-08
修稿时间:2001年12月14

Reflections on the Debate about Human Nature and Class Nature between Liang Shiqiu and Lu Xun
Lu Daofu.Reflections on the Debate about Human Nature and Class Nature between Liang Shiqiu and Lu Xun[J].Journal of Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University,2002(1):29-36.
Authors:Lu Daofu
Abstract:A very heated debate between the great writers Liang Shiqiu and Lu Xun about the human nature and the class nature of literary writings,took place in the history of modern chinese literary criticism during the 1930s,with which several topics were involved,such as their different political option,cultural preference,aesthetic value,the quality of writings,and the function of literature.It is currently necessary for us to re read their disputes over the issues in the historical context,for it might bring on a new perspective,a new paradigm to the cultural implication and the genesis of modern Chinese literary criticism.
Keywords:human nature  class nature  debate  literature  theory  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号