Conservative Public Interest Litigation |
| |
Authors: | Terence J Pell |
| |
Institution: | (1) Center for Individual Rights, Washington, DC, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The idea that lawsuits can move a public as well as a legal agenda is not new. In recent years, conservatives have brought
high profile lawsuits designed both to vindicate the rights of an individual plaintiff and to educate the public about an
important issue. For example, lawsuits filed nearly 10 years ago against the University of Michigan’s race-based admissions
system eventually led to the successful passage of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative in 2006, which amended the Michigan
Constitution to ban the use of racial preferences. Terence Pell recounts the legal effort and the effects, both intended and
unintended, that it had on Michigan institutions and public thinking. |
| |
Keywords: | MCRI Affirmative action Group preferences College Admissions BAMN Racial preferences University of Michigan Michigan Civil Rights Initiative |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|