| 经典社会学中关于研究方法的讨论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 方莉琳.经典社会学中关于研究方法的讨论[J].柳州师专学报,2013(4):98-101. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 方莉琳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学社会学系,江苏南京210046 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从社会学概念界定出发,梳理了经典时期有关社会学研究方法的讨论,并以迪尔凯姆和韦伯的社会学研究方法为线索来思考社会学研究方法,认为两者的方法论是互补关系而不是对立关系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 社会学 研究方法 实证主义 反实证主义 |
A Discussion of Social Research Methods in the Classical Period |
| |
| FANG Lilin.A Discussion of Social Research Methods in the Classical Period[J].Journal of Liuzhou Teachers College,2013(4):98-101. |
| |
| Authors: | FANG Lilin |
| |
| Institution: | FANG Lilin (School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University,Jiangsu, Nanjing ,210046 China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Starting from the concept of sociology and the consideration of traditions, the paper introduces the development of social re- search methods in the classical period,and a detailed discussion about E.Durkheim＇ s and Max Weber＇ s methods,and draws the conclu- sion that E.Durkheim＇ s and Max Weber＇ s methods are complementary rather than contrary. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sociology research method positivism anti-positivism |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
