| Abstract: | The present study explored two distinct methods of calculating a precise measure of gender-based wage differentials among male and female faculty. The first estimation considered wage differences using a formula based on human capital, while the second method included a compensation for past discriminatory practices. Each of the two formulas was used to derive a precise indication of wage differences for each female respondent in a nationally represented database. Both measures of wage differentials were used in multiple regression equations to predict three specific aspects of affective outcomes. Findings suggested that only differences in human capital should be considered in predicting job satisfaction and intent to remain in academe. However, a formula that included a compensation for past discriminations was more appropriate in predicting job-related stress. Differences in explained variance magnified the importance of choosing an appropriate calculation method. |
