平衡论解构

"平衡论"只不过是管理论和控权论的调和论。如果说传统行政法的管理论和控权论存在价值选择方面的冲突的话,现代行政法的管理论和控权论已经实现统一,即控权是目的、授权是手段,控权与授权是统一的,区别只是控权力度和授权程度。"平衡论"讨论的是宪法问题而不是行政法问题,是价值选择(价值取向)问题而不是研究视角的问题。就价值选择而言,要么控制行政机关的权力,要么控制相对方的权利,平衡是不存在的。至于行政机关权力与相对方权利的关系,由于具体的行政权力没有与之对应的相对方权利,也不存在平衡问题;行政机关的权力作为广义权利的特殊表现形式,是权利与义务的统一,与相对方的权利不存在平衡问题。

On Equilibrium Theory of Administrative Law

Equilibrium theory of administrative law is only the mixture of governing theory and controlling theory of administrative law Modern governing theory and controlling theory of administrative law have agreed that controlling power is the goal and granting power is the method, although they still have conflict about the extent of controlling power and the range of granting power. What equilibrium theory of administrative law refers to is constitutional law rather than administrative law What it is concerned with is choice of values rather than research perspectives As far as choice of values is concerned, there exists no equilibrium; there is either power of controlling administrative organs or power of controlling the opposite party. As for the relationship between the power of administrative organs and that of the opposite party, there exists no equilibrium, either, because concrete administrative power is not matched by corresponding power of the opposite party. Besides, administrative power, as a special form of manifestation of power in its broad sense, is the unity of power and duty And there is no equilibrium between administrative power and that of the opposite party