首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Classifying racial and ethnic group data in the United States: the politics of negotiation and accommodation
Institution:2. Georgia Center for Cancer Statistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA;1. College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, PR China;2. College of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, PR China;3. Centre for Quantum Computation & Intelligent Systems, FEIT, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia;1. Advance-CTR, Providence, RI;2. Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI;3. Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI;4. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI;5. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;6. Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI;7. Division of Urology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI;8. Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
Abstract:“Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity,” formerly known as “Statistical Policy Directive 15,” is a classification system that has formed the basis of the U.S. government's collection and presentation of data on race and ethnicity since 1977. During the mid-1990s, it underwent a public evaluation to determine whether the racial and ethnic group categories should be revised. This article examines the history of Statistical Policy Directive 15 from its origins through October 1997 and evaluates its consequences on political, economic, and social life. Among the many lessons that government information specialists can take away from the history of Statistical Policy Directive 15 is that classification systems are not neutral tools that objectively reflect and measure the empirical world. Classification systems cannot be isolated from the larger political setting. They are tightly linked to public policies, and, in the case of racial and ethnic group classification, they constitute highly contested social policy about which there is little public consensus.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号