| 律师阅卷权的范围与界限——《律师法》第34条之检讨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 季理华,程捷. 律师阅卷权的范围与界限——《律师法》第34条之检讨[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 30(4): 61-65 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 季理华 程捷 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江工业大学,法学院,浙江,杭州,310023;中国青年政治学院,法律系,北京,100089 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 新修订之《律师法》第34条关于辩护律师阅卷权范围的规定存在着与现行《刑事诉讼法》、相关司法解释以及行政规章的衔接性障碍。从法理角度观察,辩护律师的阅卷范围并不应漫无边际,划定其界限的标准在于资讯先悉机制的限度、职务代表性原理、证据关联性要求、审判独立原则的保证以及律师职业伦理的导向。因此,律师阅卷的范围仅限于办案机关移送审查起诉或审判的证据材料与卷宗正本,而不应包括以办案机关内部意见为内容的副卷。
|
| 关 键 词： | 律师阅卷权 资讯先悉 关联性 职业伦理 |
On the Applicable Scope and Limits of Lawyer's Right to Reading Files |
| |
| JI Li-hua,CHENG Jie. On the Applicable Scope and Limits of Lawyer's Right to Reading Files[J]. Journal of Xinyang Teachers College(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 30(4): 61-65 |
| |
| Authors: | JI Li-hua CHENG Jie |
| |
| Affiliation: | (Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023;China Youth University for Political Sciences,Beijing 100089,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | There exists a difference on the applicable scope of lawyer＇s right to reading files between the article 34 of amended Law of PRC on Lawyers and contemporary systems embodied in criminal procedure law of China,related judiciary interpretations and administrative regulations.Refer to the jurisprudence,the applicable scope of lawyer＇s right to reading files should not be unrestrained.The application of the right should be limited according to the content of disclosure,relevancy of evidence,representative of prosecution,principle of independent trial and legal professional ethics.Consequently,instead of the inner files,only original files transferred by investigative organs and the other materials transferred by procuratorial organs can be examined by lawyers in different stage. |
| |
| Keywords: | Lawyer＇s right to reading files evidence disclosure relevancy of evidence legal professional ethics |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
