| 对"是"与"应当"的回应--走向后现代和生态意识的自然价值观 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李田. 对"是"与"应当"的回应--走向后现代和生态意识的自然价值观[J]. 广东技术师范学院学报, 2002, 0(2): 22-27 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李田 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东职业技术师范学院,社科部,广东,广州,510665 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自然价值是生态中心主义的一个核心概念.自其被提出以来,在学术界引起了极大的争论.本文对现代科学和哲学关于"是"与"应当"的回应进行了介绍,对罗尔斯顿关于自然价值与义务的阐释进行了讨论.我们认为,随着主客体两分的消失,"是"与"应当"之间的鸿沟也得以消解.这样,自然价值观念的确立也就理所当然.
|
| 关 键 词： | 自然价值,罗尔斯顿," 是" ," 应当" |
| 文章编号： | 1009-2803(2002)02-0022-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001-12-19 |
Response to"Is" and "Ought-to-be"--Go to the Natural Value of Postmodern and Ecological Consciousness |
| |
| Li Tian. Response to"Is" and "Ought-to-be"--Go to the Natural Value of Postmodern and Ecological Consciousness[J]. Journal of Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, 2002, 0(2): 22-27 |
| |
| Authors: | Li Tian |
| |
| Abstract: | Natural value is a core concept of ecocentricism.Since it has been put forward,it has given rise to much controversy in the sphere of learning.This essay introduces the response of modern science and philosophy to the traditional"is"and "ought to be"and focuses on Holmes Rolston's explaination for natural value and ought.This paper believes that the gap between"is"and"ought to be"disappears with the denial of the extremity of subject and object,leading to an ensured establishment of te concept on natural value. |
| |
| Keywords: | natural value,Rolston," Is" ," Ought to be |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
