首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论证评估与谬误
引用本文:韩军喜.论证评估与谬误[J].商丘师范学院学报,2004,20(3):27-29.
作者姓名:韩军喜
作者单位:[波兰]华沙大学,哲学系
摘    要:谬误研究是逻辑学研究的理论难点和前沿课题。历史上曾就谬误的定义和分类形成不同的观点。本文在分析这些观点的基础上指出,结合论证评估进行谬误研究才是建立逻辑谬误理论的正确途径,并初步给出了论证评估的三条基本原则和一种新的谬误分类体系。

关 键 词:逻辑  论证评估  谬误  谬误分类
文章编号:1672-3600(2004)03-0027-03
修稿时间:2003年11月18

The Judgements of Proof and the Fallacies
HAN Jung-shi.The Judgements of Proof and the Fallacies[J].Journal of Shangqiu Teachers College,2004,20(3):27-29.
Authors:HAN Jung-shi
Abstract:The study of fallacies is a theoretic difficulty and the leading edge of study of logic.In history,there were many different definitions and categories of fallacies,on which the paper makes some brief commonts.After that,the paper comes to such a conclusion that logical study of fallacies should base on the study of proof.Finally,the writer tries to offer some principles of judgements of proof and a new category of fallacies.
Keywords:Logic  Judgements of Proof  Fallacies  Category of Fallacies
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号