首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

反思与重构:证据法学理论基础研究
引用本文:万毅,林喜芬.反思与重构:证据法学理论基础研究[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005,32(6):95-102.
作者姓名:万毅  林喜芬
作者单位:1. 上海交通大学,法学院,上海,200030
2. 四川大学,法学院,四川,成都,610064
摘    要:传统理论关于证据法学乏理论基础存在着“一元论”和“二元论”之争,尤其是关于“认识论”和“价值论”在证据法学理论基础中的地位问题,也历来存在着不同的认识和主张。在程序正义理论日益成为诉讼法学主流理论的背景下,理论上有贬低“认识论”在证据法学理论基础中的地位的趋向,这是不符合证据法律制度的历史发展事实以及证据法学的学科特点的。只有将“认识论”和“价值论”同时作为证据法学的理论基础,才能真正建立科学、合理的证据法学。

关 键 词:证据法学  认识论  价值论  事实  法律  法学理论  基础研究  程序正义理论  传统理论  地位问题
文章编号:1000-5315(2005)06-0095-08
收稿时间:2004-06-11
修稿时间:2004-06-11

Theory Base Study of Evidence Jurisprudence
WAN Yi,LIN Xi-fen.Theory Base Study of Evidence Jurisprudence[J].Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Science Edition),2005,32(6):95-102.
Authors:WAN Yi  LIN Xi-fen
Institution:1.Law Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, Shanghai 200030;2. Law Institute, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610068, China
Abstract:There exists in the traditional theory about the theory base of evidence jurisprudence a controversy of "monism" and "dualism",especially controversial understanding and position concerning the status problem of "epistemology" and "axiology" in evidence jurisprudence theory base.In the circumstances that the procedure justice theory increasingly becomes the mainstream theory in procedural law,there is a theoretical trend that belittles the position of "epistemology" in the theory base of evidence jurisprudence,which does not conform to the historical development facts of evidence legal system and the discipline characteristics of evidence jurisprudence.Only when "epistemology" and "axiology" are regarded as the theory base of evidence jurisprudence at the same time can a scientific and reasonable evidence jurisprudence be really established.
Keywords:evidence jurisprudence  epistemology  axiology  fact  law
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号