In Support of Unfinished Inclusion |
| |
Authors: | Rune Sarromaa Hausstätter |
| |
Institution: | Department of Education and Social Work, Lillehammer University College |
| |
Abstract: | This article claims that the radical potential inherent in the origins of inclusive education has been altered into a tool for protecting the status quo. Drawing on ideas from the essay ‘The Unfinished’ by Thomas Mathiesen (1971) Mathiesen, T. (1971). Det uferdige. Bidrag til politisk aksjonsteori. The unfinished. A contribution to political action theory]. Oslo: Pax forlag. Google Scholar], I discuss inclusion as a potential alternative to mainstream education and argue that the potential power of change in this alternative view of schooling is greatly reduced because the inclusion movement, as it is appears today, tends to offer finished solutions. To create a viable alternative to mainstream education requires an understanding of unfinished inclusion because this opens an uncertainty within education that may make the established system more open to change. The unfinished will in this way restore the disruptive potential of inclusive education. |
| |
Keywords: | special education guerrilla tactic political and institutional change |
|
|