| “坦白从宽，抗拒从严”制度化的法理分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐继强,孙瑜,王华. “坦白从宽，抗拒从严”制度化的法理分析[J]. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004, 33(6): 52-56 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐继强 孙瑜 王华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海师范大学法政学院，上海师范大学法政学院，上海师范大学法政学院 上海 200234，上海 200234，上海 200234 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文运用法社会学、法经济学和制度分析的方法,对我国刑事司法实践中的"坦白从宽,抗拒从严"基本刑事政策和美国刑事司法实践中的"辩诉交易"制度进行分析比较,指出作为刑讯逼供的替代,应将"坦白从宽,抗拒从严"刑事政策制度化。
|
| 关 键 词： | 坦白从宽 抗拒从严 辩诉交易 制度化 替代 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-8634(2004)06-0052-(05) |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-10-08 |
Legal-Principle-Based Analysis of the Institutionalization of "Leniency to Those Who Confess Their Crimes and Severity to Those Who Refuse to" |
| |
| XU Jiqiang,SUN Yu,WANG Hua. Legal-Principle-Based Analysis of the Institutionalization of "Leniency to Those Who Confess Their Crimes and Severity to Those Who Refuse to"[J]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 33(6): 52-56 |
| |
| Authors: | XU Jiqiang SUN Yu WANG Hua |
| |
| Abstract: | By employing the methods of sociology of law, economics of law and institutional analysis, this paper makes a comparison between the basic criminal policy of "Leniency to Those Who Confess Their Crimes and Severity to Those Who Refuse to" carried out in Chinese judicial practice with regard to criminal cases and the " plea bargaining" institution put into effect in American judicial practice concerning criminal offences. The paper points out that, as an alternative for extortion of a confession by torture, the criminal policy of " Leniency to Those Who Confess Their Crimes and Severity to Those Who Refuse to" should be institutionalized. |
| |
| Keywords: | " Leniency to Those Who Confess Their Crimes and Severity to Those Who Refuse to" , " plea bargaining" , institu tionalization, alternative or substitute |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
