The quality assurance of a national English writing assessment: Policy implications for quality improvement |
| |
Institution: | 1. School of Foreign Languages, Wuhan University of Technology, China;2. School of Teacher Education, Jiangsu University, China;3. School of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, China |
| |
Abstract: | The purpose of this study was to examine the quality assurance issues of a national English writing assessment in Chinese higher education. Specifically, using generalizability theory and rater interviews, this study examined how the current scoring policy of the TEM-4 (Test for English Majors – Band 4, a high-stakes national standardized EFL assessment in China) writing could impact its score variability and reliability. Eighteen argumentative essays written by nine English major undergraduate students were selected as the writing samples. Ten TEM-4 raters were first invited to use the authentic TEM-4 writing scoring rubric to score these essays holistically and analytically (with time intervals in between). They were then interviewed for their views on how the current scoring policy of the TEM-4 writing assessment could affect its overall quality. The quantitative generalizability theory results of this study suggested that the current scoring policy would not yield acceptable reliability coefficients. The qualitative results supported the generalizability theory findings. Policy implications for quality improvement of the TEM-4 writing assessment in China are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | EFL writing assessment Quality assurance Generalizability theory Score variability Score reliability |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|