| 董仲舒的人性学说并非是“中民之性” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄开国,苟奉山.董仲舒的人性学说并非是“中民之性”[J].衡水师专学报,2013(6):1-5. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄开国 苟奉山 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]四川师范大学政教学院,四川成都610068 [2]中国民用航空飞行学院飞行技术学院,四川广汉618307 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 董仲舒的人性论一直众说纷纭，近年来又有董仲舒的人性论是中民之性的新说提出。但董仲舒的人性论并不存在所谓人之性与民之性的两类文字的区分，更没有以人之性即为圣人之性的观念，新说关于中民之性的论述，也难以成立，究其原因在于新说不了解董仲舒的人性论处于儒学人性论“性同一说”向“性品级说”转变的逻辑关节点。
|
| 关 键 词： | 董仲舒 人性学说 中民之性 《深察名号》 《实性》 |
Dong Zhongshu’s Theory of Human Nature is Not“The Nature of Ordinary People” |
| |
| HUANG Kai-guo,GOU Feng-shan.Dong Zhongshu’s Theory of Human Nature is Not“The Nature of Ordinary People”[J].Journal of Hengshui Normal College,2013(6):1-5. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Kai-guo GOU Feng-shan |
| |
| Institution: | 1. College of Political Education, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610068, China; (2. College of Flight Technology, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, Sichuan 618307, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Dong Zhongshu’s theory of human nature has been debated for a long time. There is a new argument in recent years that Dong Zhongshu’s theory of human nature is the nature of ordinary people. However, there is no difference between human nature and resident nature in Dong Zhongshu’s theory of human nature. And there is also no saying that human nature means sage nature. The new argument about the nature of ordinary people has no basis. The reason is that the new argument does not know that Dong Zhongshu’s theory of human nature is a turning point from the unity of nature to the grade of nature in Confucianist human nature. |
| |
| Keywords: | Dong Zhongshu theory of human nature the nature of ordinary people Shen Cha Min Hao Shi Xing |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
