首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A critical analysis of the INQAAHE Guidelines of Good Practice for higher education quality assurance agencies
Authors:Douglas Blackmur
Institution:(1) Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Western Cape, P/B X17, Bellville, 7535, South Africa
Abstract:The International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education’s Guidelines of Good Practice by higher education quality assurance agencies need substantial revision before they can be considered adequate by stakeholders in any national higher education system. Various revisions are proposed in this article. But the International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education also argues that adoption of its Guidelines of Good Practice has international significance in that the decisions about higher education quality made by agencies which comply with them can be accepted at face value universally. This conclusion, however, cannot be accepted until the Guidelines of Good Practice are amended to address the processes whereby each agency can become comfortable with the criteria and standards which the others impose in their respective jurisdictions. This article also maintains that, even if the Guidelines of Good Practice were technically perfect, agencies and/or governments ought to subject any proposals for their implementation to the discipline of rigorous risk management processes.
Contact Information Douglas BlackmurEmail:
Keywords:Higher education quality assurance  International Network of Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education: Guidelines of Good Practice  Mutual recognition of higher education quality assurance agencies’  decisions  Performance ratings of higher education quality assurance agencies  Regulation of cross-border provision of higher education
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号