| 后现代主义关于历史认识主观性观点之评析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵澜. 后现代主义关于历史认识主观性观点之评析[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005, 0(4): 9-12 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵澜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 福建师范大学社会历史学院,福建,福州350007 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 历史认识的主观性成分与其他学科相比较要大得多,其内涵和表现也要复杂得多.后现代主义史学从历史叙述文本的主观性和新解释学理论入手来批判19世纪以来形成的对历史认识客观性的信念,对西方的历史认识论产生了很大冲击,促进了当代西方史学的反思和变革.我们要以唯物史观为指导,在新的历史认识基础上重新思考,对这一问题作出新的解答.
|
| 关 键 词： | 历史认识 主观性 后现代主义史学 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5285（2005）04-0009-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-04-12 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-04-12 |
Post-Modernism and the Subjectivity Historiography |
| |
| ZHAO Lan. Post-Modernism and the Subjectivity Historiography[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edtion), 2005, 0(4): 9-12 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Lan |
| |
| Abstract: | It is believed that the cognition of history is more subjective than other courses. Post- modernists deem that the text of history is subjective and,by the theory of new hermeneutic, criticize the faith that the knowledge of history is objective,a kind of faith that was formed since the 19th century.With this shock,restrospect and change happened in the western historiography,and we should,with the guide of materialism,find a new solution to this problem. |
| |
| Keywords: | subjectivity historiography post-modernism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
