首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Tasks, topics and relevance judging for the TREC Genomics Track: five years of experience evaluating biomedical text information retrieval systems
Authors:Phoebe M. Roberts  Aaron M. Cohen  William R. Hersh
Affiliation:(1) Pfizer Research Technology Center, 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA;(2) Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code BICC, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA
Abstract:With the help of a team of expert biologist judges, the TREC Genomics track has generated four large sets of “gold standard” test collections, comprised of over a hundred unique topics, two kinds of ad hoc retrieval tasks, and their corresponding relevance judgments. Over the years of the track, increasingly complex tasks necessitated the creation of judging tools and training guidelines to accommodate teams of part-time short-term workers from a variety of specialized biological scientific backgrounds, and to address consistency and reproducibility of the assessment process. Important lessons were learned about factors that influenced the utility of the test collections including topic design, annotations provided by judges, methods used for identifying and training judges, and providing a central moderator “meta-judge”.
Keywords:Reference standards  Evaluation  Inter-annotator agreement  Text mining  Information retrieval
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号